Home › Studies › PRJEB29491
PRJEB29491 ERP111797

Gut virome in adult monozygotic twins, cross-sectional

The virome in adult monozygotic twins with concordant or discordant gut microbiomes

91 gut virome samples from adult monozygotic twin pairs selected for high or low microbiome concordance, examining the relationship between microbiome and virome diversity in a cross-sectional design. machine-written summary

91 samples · 92 runs · US · Adult · 2019 · 0.54 Gbp / sample

Sources
✓Sequence archive 273✓Abstract / description 91✓Full text 91–Supplementary tables–External resources–User contribution–Human verified

Checked this project's papers and archive records yourself? Mark it human-verified.

what each source gave
✓ Sequence archive273 sample values (family id, family role, subject id)
✓ Abstract / description91 sample values (health condition detail)
✓ Full text91 sample values (country) · PMC11986028, PMC6411085, PMC7062461
– Supplementary tablesno supplementary tables available (or none open access)
– External resourcesnot covered by the external resources we ingest
– User contributionnothing uploaded yet
– Human verifiednot yet checked by a person · I checked this project — verify it
Samples at a glance
1 country
Age
adult91
Country
US91
Body site
primary91
Sequencing depth per sample · this project all projects
all projects, 0–0.03 Gbp: 25,080 samples (4 %)all projects, 0.03–0.1 Gbp: 17,066 samples (3 %)all projects, 0.1–0.3 Gbp: 29,179 samples (5 %)this project, 0.1–0.3 Gbp: 3 samplesall projects, 0.3–1 Gbp: 47,044 samples (8 %)this project, 0.3–1 Gbp: 80 samplesall projects, 1–3 Gbp: 124,983 samples (22 %)this project, 1–3 Gbp: 8 samplesall projects, 3–10 Gbp: 253,728 samples (44 %)all projects, 10–30 Gbp: 72,533 samples (13 %)all projects, 30–100 Gbp: 3,024 samples (1 %)all projects, 100–300 Gbp: 106 samples (0 %)all projects, ≥ 300 Gbp: 9 samples (0 %)project median 0.54 Gbp per sample0130Gbp
Sampling design and relatedness

longitudinal — not resolvedtwins

45 of 46 people sampled more than once (90 samples; median 2, up to 2 per person).

21 adult monozygotic twin pairs + 2 additional twin pairs (A/B co-twins); co-twins not cohabiting · 23 families with 46 sampled people, 46 twin sets.

twinTtwinT
23 × twin×2
twin mz: 10A, 10BMZ10A — twin · 2 samplesT10A10B — twin · 2 samplesT10B
twin mz: 11A, 11BMZ11A — twin · 2 samplesT11A11B — twin · 2 samplesT11B
twin mz: 12A, 12BMZ12A — twin · 2 samplesT12A12B — twin · 2 samplesT12B
twin mz: 13A, 13BMZ13A — twin · 2 samplesT13A13B — twin · 2 samplesT13B
twin mz: 14A, 14BMZ14A — twin · 2 samplesT14A14B — twin · 2 samplesT14B
twin mz: 15A, 15BMZ15A — twin · 2 samplesT15A15B — twin · 2 samplesT15B
twin mz: 16A, 16BMZ16A — twin · 2 samplesT16A16B — twin · 2 samplesT16B
twin mz: 17A, 17BMZ17A — twin · 2 samplesT17A17B — twin · 2 samplesT17B
twin mz: 18A, 18BMZ18A — twin · 2 samplesT18A18B — twin · 2 samplesT18B
twin mz: 19A, 19BMZ19A — twin · 2 samplesT19A19B — twin · 2 samplesT19B
twin mz: 1A, 1BMZ1A — twin · 2 samplesT1A1B — twin · 2 samplesT1B
twin mz: 20A, 20BMZ20A — twin · 2 samplesT20A20B — twin · 2 samplesT20B
twin mz: 21A, 21BMZ21A — twin · 2 samplesT21A21B — twin · 2 samplesT21B
twin: 22A, 22B22A — twin · 2 samplesT22A22B — twin · 2 samplesT22B
twin: 23A, 23B23A — twin · 1 sampleT23A23B — twin · 2 samplesT23B
twin mz: 2A, 2BMZ2A — twin · 2 samplesT2A2B — twin · 2 samplesT2B
twin mz: 3A, 3BMZ3A — twin · 2 samplesT3A3B — twin · 2 samplesT3B
twin mz: 4A, 4BMZ4A — twin · 2 samplesT4A4B — twin · 2 samplesT4B
twin mz: 5A, 5BMZ5A — twin · 2 samplesT5A5B — twin · 2 samplesT5B
twin mz: 6A, 6BMZ6A — twin · 2 samplesT6A6B — twin · 2 samplesT6B
twin mz: 7A, 7BMZ7A — twin · 2 samplesT7A7B — twin · 2 samplesT7B
twin mz: 8A, 8BMZ8A — twin · 2 samplesT8A8B — twin · 2 samplesT8B
twin mz: 9A, 9BMZ9A — twin · 2 samplesT9A9B — twin · 2 samplesT9B

twin · circles are people (pale = no sequenced sample), arrows run donor → recipient and parent → child, curved lines join twins, partners and siblings, squares are shared settings or families without recorded roles. Shown: 23 linked groups from explicit relations. 46 people in the project overall.

Families (23)
familymemberssamples
1twin×2SAMEA5065330 · SAMEA5065331 · SAMEA5065372 · SAMEA5065373
10twin×2SAMEA5065332 · SAMEA5065333 · SAMEA5065374 · SAMEA5065375
8twin×2SAMEA5065316 · SAMEA5065317 · SAMEA5065358 · SAMEA5065359
7twin×2SAMEA5065322 · SAMEA5065323 · SAMEA5065364 · SAMEA5065365
6twin×2SAMEA5065344 · SAMEA5065345 · SAMEA5065386 · SAMEA5065387
5twin×2SAMEA5065340 · SAMEA5065341 · SAMEA5065382 · SAMEA5065383
4twin×2SAMEA5065336 · SAMEA5065337 · SAMEA5065378 · SAMEA5065379
3twin×2SAMEA5065314 · SAMEA5065315 · SAMEA5065356 · SAMEA5065357
22twin×2SAMEA7096221 · SAMEA7096222 · SAMEA7096225 · SAMEA7096226
21twin×2SAMEA5065348 · SAMEA5065349 · SAMEA5065390 · SAMEA5065391
20twin×2SAMEA5065328 · SAMEA5065329 · SAMEA5065370 · SAMEA5065371
2twin×2SAMEA5065346 · SAMEA5065347 · SAMEA5065388 · SAMEA5065389
19twin×2SAMEA5065334 · SAMEA5065335 · SAMEA5065376 · SAMEA5065377
18twin×2SAMEA5065320 · SAMEA5065321 · SAMEA5065362 · SAMEA5065363
17twin×2SAMEA5065318 · SAMEA5065319 · SAMEA5065360 · SAMEA5065361
16twin×2SAMEA5065352 · SAMEA5065353 · SAMEA5065394 · SAMEA5065395
15twin×2SAMEA5065324 · SAMEA5065325 · SAMEA5065366 · SAMEA5065367
14twin×2SAMEA5065354 · SAMEA5065355 · SAMEA5065396 · SAMEA5065397
13twin×2SAMEA5065350 · SAMEA5065351 · SAMEA5065392 · SAMEA5065393
12twin×2SAMEA5065326 · SAMEA5065327 · SAMEA5065368 · SAMEA5065369
11twin×2SAMEA5065338 · SAMEA5065339 · SAMEA5065380 · SAMEA5065381
9twin×2SAMEA5065342 · SAMEA5065343 · SAMEA5065384 · SAMEA5065385
23twin×2SAMEA7096223 · SAMEA7096224 · SAMEA7096228

How longitudinal and relatedness information is derived

Community composition
Ruminococcoides 7.8%Bacteroides 4.5%CAG-302 4.1%Phocaeicola 2.6%CAG-217 2.4%Ruminococcus_C 2.1%Faecalibacterium 2.0%Monoglobus 1.6%Intestinibacter 1.6%Turicibacter 1.5%Terrisporobacter 1.1%CAG-533 1.1%not assigned to a genus 56.2%other genera 11.5%

Genera, mean relative abundance over 45 profiled gut samples of this project (Sandpiper SingleM profiles, GTDB R232; low-depth and non-metagenome profiles left out).

Field coverage
fieldsamplescoverageR1R2R3R4
age_category91 100%
country91 100%91
health_condition0 0%
subject_id91 100%91
family_id91 100%91
family_role91 100%91
health_condition_detail91 100%91
Papers (3)
  • Virome Diversity Correlates with Intestinal Microbiome Diversity in Adult Monozygotic Twins. 2019 PMID 30763537 PMC6411085 own_data
  • Resurrection of a global, metagenomically defined gokushovirus. 2020 PMID 32101162 PMC7062461 unsure
  • Characterization of the phyllosphere virome of fresh vegetables and potential transfer to the human gut. 2025 PMID 40210629 PMC11986028 unsure
Details
Archive description

The human gut virome varies far more between hosts than the microbiome. Within twin-pairs, viromes have been shown to be similar for infants but not for adults, indicating that as twins age and their environments diverge, so do their viromes. The degree to which the microbiome drives the virome’s vast diversity is unclear. Here, we examined the relationship between microbiome diversity and virome diversity in 21 adult monozygotic twin pairs selected for high or low microbiome concordance. Viromes derived from virus-like particles were unique to each subject, dominated by Caudovirales and Microviridae, and exhibited a small core that included crAssphage. Microbiome-discordant twins had more dissimilar viromes compared to microbiome-concordant twins, and the richer the microbiomes, the richer the viromes. These patterns were driven by the bacteriophages, not eukaryotic viruses. These observations support a strong role of the microbiome in patterning the virome.

How this project entered the registry

Classified as human gut / stool shotgun DNA metagenome of adult by sonnet_x2 with confidence 0.72. Assay shotgun_dna.

  • host study.title · “adult monozygotic twins with concordant”
  • body site study.title · “discordant gut microbiomes”
  • life stage study.title · “adult monozygotic twins”
Evidence examples (one per field × route)
samplefieldvaluerouteconf.sourcequote
SAMEA5065314countryUSR30.70paper.fulltext.methodsapproved by the Cornell University IRB
SAMEA5065314family_id3R10.70sample.name_rule:TITLETITLE: 3B
SAMEA5065314family_roletwinR10.70sample.name_rule:TITLETITLE: 3B
SAMEA5065314health_condition_detailmixed_case_control: Twin pairs selected for microbiome concordance status; no explicit health/disease status stated for R40.45study.descriptionselected for high or low microbiome concordance
SAMEA5065314subject_id3BR10.70sample.name_rule:title3B
Sequencing

92 runs over 91 samples · mean 0.62 Gbp per run (median 0.54 Gbp, total 57.19 Gbp; 92 runs with a base count) · layout PAIRED 84, SINGLE 8 · platform ILLUMINA 92 · models Illumina HiSeq 2500 (92) · 86% of runs with a Sandpiper profile · first public 2019-02-08 – 2020-07-29

Authors (19)

Moreno-Gallego JL first · Chou SP · Di Rienzi SC · Goodrich JK · Spector TD · Bell JT · Youngblut ND · Hewson I · Reyes A · Ley RE last · Kirchberger PC first · Ochman H last · Park JW first · Yun YE · Cho JA · Yoon SI · In SA · Park EJ · Kim MS last

Downloads

PRJEB29491.csv.gz (3.1 KB) · parquet (73.2 KB) — all 91 samples, every field with route and confidence · PRJEB29491_determinations.csv.gz (5.2 KB) — 455 evidence rows

Samples (91 · every field this project has values for · hover a cell for its source)
Loading the sample table…