Home › Studies › PRJEB30796
PRJEB30796 ERP113279

Phage isolation methods in healthy adult faeces, France

We analysed five different techniques to isolate phages from human adult faeces

33 faecal samples from healthy French adults, used to compare five phage isolation techniques, MDA amplification reproducibility, and sequencing depth effects on phage diversity; cross-sectional design. machine-written summary

33 samples · 33 runs · FR · Adult · 2019 · 0.33 Gbp / sample

Sources
✓Sequence archive 192○Abstract / description✓Full text 66○Supplementary tables–External resources–User contribution–Human verified

Checked this project's papers and archive records yourself? Mark it human-verified.

what each source gave
✓ Sequence archive192 sample values (collection date, country, latitude, location region, longitude, subject id)
○ Abstract / descriptionread; no usable statement
✓ Full text66 sample values (health condition, health condition detail) · PMC6683287
○ Supplementary tablesfiles read; no table could be matched to the samples
– External resourcesnot covered by the external resources we ingest
– User contributionnothing uploaded yet
– Human verifiednot yet checked by a person · I checked this project — verify it
Interventions

intervention — arms not resolved

Other administered intervention (see intervention_detail) design observational_with_procedure · population healthy_control · Methodological comparison of phage isolation/extraction techniques from faeces, incl. MDA

“five different techniques to isolate phages” — bioproject.description (study level; per-sample arms are in the intervention column below)

Samples at a glance
1 sampling locations · 1 country
Age
adult33
Condition
healthy_control33
Country
FR33
Body site
primary33
Sequencing depth per sample · this project all projects
all projects, 0–0.03 Gbp: 25,080 samples (4 %)all projects, 0.03–0.1 Gbp: 17,066 samples (3 %)all projects, 0.1–0.3 Gbp: 29,179 samples (5 %)this project, 0.1–0.3 Gbp: 13 samplesall projects, 0.3–1 Gbp: 47,044 samples (8 %)this project, 0.3–1 Gbp: 18 samplesall projects, 1–3 Gbp: 124,983 samples (22 %)this project, 1–3 Gbp: 1 samplesall projects, 3–10 Gbp: 253,728 samples (44 %)all projects, 10–30 Gbp: 72,533 samples (13 %)this project, 10–30 Gbp: 1 samplesall projects, 30–100 Gbp: 3,024 samples (1 %)all projects, 100–300 Gbp: 106 samples (0 %)all projects, ≥ 300 Gbp: 9 samples (0 %)project median 0.33 Gbp per sample0130Gbp
Sampling design and relatedness

longitudinal — not resolved

3 of 3 people sampled more than once (27 samples; median 9, up to 9 per person).

How longitudinal and relatedness information is derived

Community composition
Onthocola_B 13.5%Bacteroides 8.7%Prevotella 8.3%Roseburia 7.2%CAG-302 7.2%Alistipes 4.6%Faecalibacterium 3.0%Ruminiclostridium_E 2.5%CAG-245 2.2%Scatomorpha 1.5%CAG-314 1.2%UMGS1754 1.0%not assigned to a genus 26.6%other genera 12.5%

Genera, mean relative abundance over 2 profiled gut samples of this project (Sandpiper SingleM profiles, GTDB R232; low-depth and non-metagenome profiles left out).

Field coverage
fieldsamplescoverageR1R2R3R4
age_category33 100%
country33 100%33
health_condition33 100%33
subject_id27 82%27
collection_date33 100%33
detailed_location33 100%
health_condition_detail33 100%33
latitude33 100%33
location_region33 100%33
longitude33 100%33
Papers (1)
  • A simple, reproducible and cost-effective procedure to analyse gut phageome: from phage isolation to bioinformatic approach. 2019 PMID 31383878 PMC6683287 own_data
Details
Archive description

The microbiota of the human gut is a complex and rich community where bacteria and their viruses, the phages, are numerically dominant. While the bacterial components have been extensively studied, there are fewer studies on the phage community and no clear standard for isolating the phages and sequencing and analysing their genomes. Since this makes comparisons between studies difficult, we aimed at defining an easy, low-cost, and reproducible methodology for each of these three steps. We analysed five different techniques to isolate phages from human adult faeces and developed a pipeline to analyse their genomes in order to quantify contamination and classify phage contigs in terms of taxonomy and lifestyle. Among the five techniques, we chose the polyethylene glycol concentration method to isolate phages because of its simplicity, low cost, reproducibility, and high number and diversity of phage sequences. We also tested the reproducibility of this method with multiple displacement amplification (MDA) and showed that MDA severely decreases the phage genetic diversity of the samples and the reproducibility of the method. Lastly, we studied the influence of depth sequencing on phage diversity and observed the beginning of a plateau for phage contigs at 20,000,000 reads. This work contributes for the development of methods to the isolation of phages in faeces and of their comparative analysis.

How this project entered the registry

Classified as human gut / stool shotgun DNA metagenome of adult by deterministic_prior with confidence 0.90. Assay shotgun_dna.

  • host external_curation.infant_catalog · “infant triage reason_code age_unknown_no_evidence”
  • body site study.title · “from human adult faeces”
  • body site study.description · “of the human gut is a complex”
  • life stage study.title · “phages from human adult faeces”
  • life stage study.description · “phages from human adult faeces and developed”
Evidence examples (one per field × route)
samplefieldvaluerouteconf.sourcequote
SAMEA5376168collection_date2015-10R10.90biosample.attribute:collection_date2015-10
SAMEA5376168countryFRR10.90sample.attr.geographic_location_country_and_or_seaFrance
SAMEA5376168health_conditionhealthy_controlR30.70paper.fulltext.methodsthree unrelated healthy adult volunteers (AA, BB and CC)
SAMEA5376168health_condition_detailhealthy adult volunteer(s)R30.70paper.fulltext.methodsthree unrelated healthy adult volunteers (AA, BB and CC)
SAMEA5376168latitude48.8534R10.90biosample.attribute:geographic_location_latitude+geographic_location_longitude48.85341 2.3488
SAMEA5376168location_regionIle-de-FranceR10.60biosample.attribute:geographic_location_latitude+geographic_location_longitude48.85341 2.3488
SAMEA5376168longitude2.3488R10.90biosample.attribute:geographic_location_latitude+geographic_location_longitude48.85341 2.3488
SAMEA5376174subject_idAAR10.70sample.name_rule:aliasalias=AA1_S;
Sequencing

33 runs over 33 samples · mean 1.03 Gbp per run (median 0.33 Gbp, total 33.90 Gbp; 33 runs with a base count) · layout PAIRED 33 · platform ILLUMINA 33 · models Illumina MiSeq (32), Illumina HiSeq 2500 (1) · 6% of runs with a Sandpiper profile · first public 2019-02-26

Authors (10)

d'Humières C first · Touchon M · Dion S · Cury J · Ghozlane A · Garcia-Garcera M · Bouchier C · Ma L · Denamur E · P C Rocha E last

Downloads

PRJEB30796.csv.gz (1.6 KB) · parquet (70.9 KB) — all 33 samples, every field with route and confidence · PRJEB30796_determinations.csv.gz (2.5 KB) — 258 evidence rows

Samples (33 · every field this project has values for · hover a cell for its source)
Loading the sample table…