Home › Studies › PRJEB38036
PRJEB38036 ERP121404

Fecal DNA extraction protocol comparison, Copenhagen

Assessment of fecal DNA extraction protocols for metagenomic study

233 DNA samples from a mock microbial community and fecal samples of 6 individuals in Copenhagen, Denmark, comparing five DNA extraction protocols against a standardized method; cross-sectional design. machine-written summary

233 samples · 234 runs · DK · Age unknown · 2020 · 12.17 Gbp / sample

Sources
✓Sequence archive 1,398○Abstract / description○Full text✓Supplementary tables 617–External resources–User contribution–Human verified

Checked this project's papers and archive records yourself? Mark it human-verified.

what each source gave
✓ Sequence archive1,398 sample values (collection date, country, latitude, location locality, location region, longitude)
○ Abstract / descriptionread; no usable statement
○ Full textread; no usable statement or table · PMC10084625, PMC7355182
✓ Supplementary tables617 sample values (age, sex, subject id)
– External resourcesnot covered by the external resources we ingest
– User contributionnothing uploaded yet
– Human verifiednot yet checked by a person · I checked this project — verify it
Samples at a glance
1 sampling locations · 1 country
Age
adult167
unknown36
child30
Sex
male137
female60
Country
DK233
Body site
primary233
Sequencing depth per sample · this project all projects
all projects, 0–0.03 Gbp: 25,080 samples (4 %)all projects, 0.03–0.1 Gbp: 17,066 samples (3 %)all projects, 0.1–0.3 Gbp: 29,179 samples (5 %)all projects, 0.3–1 Gbp: 47,044 samples (8 %)this project, 0.3–1 Gbp: 1 samplesall projects, 1–3 Gbp: 124,983 samples (22 %)all projects, 3–10 Gbp: 253,728 samples (44 %)this project, 3–10 Gbp: 47 samplesall projects, 10–30 Gbp: 72,533 samples (13 %)this project, 10–30 Gbp: 185 samplesall projects, 30–100 Gbp: 3,024 samples (1 %)all projects, 100–300 Gbp: 106 samples (0 %)all projects, ≥ 300 Gbp: 9 samples (0 %)project median 12.17 Gbp per sample0130Gbp
Sampling design and relatedness

longitudinal — not resolved

7 of 7 people sampled more than once (223 samples; median 30, up to 36 per person).

How longitudinal and relatedness information is derived

Community composition

No Sandpiper profile for this project's samples yet.

Field coverage
fieldsamplescoverageR1R2R3R4
age_category197 85%
country233 100%233
health_condition0 0%
subject_id223 96%223
collection_date233 100%233
detailed_location233 100%
latitude233 100%233
location_locality233 100%233
location_region233 100%233
longitude233 100%233
age_at_collection_days197 85%197
sex197 85%197
Papers (2)
  • Improved eukaryotic detection compatible with large-scale automated analysis of metagenomes. 2023 PMID 37032329 PMC10084625 own_data
  • Assessment of fecal DNA extraction protocols for metagenomic studies. 2020 PMID 32657325 PMC7355182 unsure
Details
Archive description

Aiming at providing an alternative method for human fecal DNA extraction, this study compared 5 DNA extraction protocols (MagPure Stool DNA KF Kit (MP), Macherey-Nagel Nucleospin Soil kit (MN), Zymo Research Quick-DNATM Fecal/Soil Microbe kit (ZYMO), MOBIO DNeasy PowerSoil protocol (PS) and MetaHIT) with a standardized protocol Q using 1 microbial mock community (MMC) (contained 8 bacterial and 2 fungal strains) and fecal samples from 6 individuals via shotgun metagenomics sequencing. For each protocol, six technical replicates were generated on the MMC and each human fecal sample. In total, 233 qualified DNA samples (36 MMC extractions and 197 human fecal DNA extractions) were subjected to shotgun sequencing and further quantitative analyses.

How this project entered the registry

Classified as human gut / stool shotgun DNA metagenome of age unknown by sonnet_x2 with confidence 0.72. Assay shotgun_dna.

  • host study.description · “human fecal DNA extraction”
  • body site run.scientific_name · “human gut metagenome”
Evidence examples (one per field × route)
samplefieldvaluerouteconf.sourcequote
SAMEA6804738age_at_collection_days12784.0R20.80paper.supp.Supplementary Tables S1-9.xlsx[ST2!Age(years)]SampleID=E-39; Age(years)=35
SAMEA6804736collection_date2017R10.90biosample.attribute:collection_date2017
SAMEA6804736countryDKR10.90sample.attr.geographic_locationDenmark: Copenhagen
SAMEA6804736latitude55.6800R10.90biosample.attribute:latitude_and_longitude55.68 N 12.57 E
SAMEA6804736location_localityCopenhagenR10.85biosample.attribute:geographic_locationDenmark: Copenhagen
SAMEA6804736location_regionCapital RegionR10.60biosample.attribute:latitude_and_longitude55.68 N 12.57 E
SAMEA6804736longitude12.5700R10.90biosample.attribute:latitude_and_longitude55.68 N 12.57 E
SAMEA6804738sexfemaleR20.80paper.supp.Supplementary Tables S1-9.xlsx[ST2!Gender]SampleID=E-39; Gender=Female
SAMEA6804737subject_idD6300R20.80paper.supp.Supplementary Tables S1-9.xlsx[ST2!Sample]SampleID=D6300-30; Sample=D6300
Sequencing

234 runs over 233 samples · mean 12.42 Gbp per run (median 12.18 Gbp, total 2,905.32 Gbp; 234 runs with a base count) · layout PAIRED 234 · platform BGISEQ 234 · models BGISEQ-500 (234) · 0% of runs with a Sandpiper profile · first public 2020-05-25

Authors (18)

Yang F first · Sun J · Luo H · Ren H · Zhou H · Lin Y · Han M · Chen B · Liao H · Brix S · Li J · Yang H · Kristiansen K · Zhong H last · Bazant W first · Blevins AS · Crouch K · Beiting DP last

Downloads

PRJEB38036.csv.gz (6.2 KB) · parquet (77.6 KB) — all 233 samples, every field with route and confidence · PRJEB38036_determinations.csv.gz (13.7 KB) — 2,015 evidence rows

Samples (233 · every field this project has values for · hover a cell for its source)
Loading the sample table…