Home › Studies › PRJEB56264
PRJEB56264 ERP141187

Psychobiotic diet intervention in healthy adults, Ireland

Psychobiotic Diet Study

380 fecal/plasma/urine samples from a randomized trial of 45 healthy Irish adults (24 psychobiotic diet, 21 control) over 4 weeks, assessing gut microbiota, metabolites, and perceived stress. machine-written summary

380 samples · 380 runs · IE · Adult · 2022 · 0.30 Gbp / sample

Sources
✓Sequence archive 1,304○Abstract / description✓Full text 1,520○Supplementary tables–External resources–User contribution–Human verified

Checked this project's papers and archive records yourself? Mark it human-verified.

what each source gave
✓ Sequence archive1,304 sample values (collection date, country, intervention, subject id)
○ Abstract / descriptionread; no usable statement
✓ Full text1,520 sample values (antibiotic exposure, health condition, health condition detail, location locality) · PMC9908549
○ Supplementary tablesfiles read; no table could be matched to the samples
– External resourcesnot covered by the external resources we ingest
– User contributionnothing uploaded yet
– Human verifiednot yet checked by a person · I checked this project — verify it
Interventions

intervention — arms not resolved

Controlled / prescribed diet or feeding regimen design randomized_controlled_trial · population healthy_control · Psychobiotic diet (high prebiotic/fermented foods) vs control diet for 4 weeks

“randomized into either a psychobiotic (n = 24) or control (n =” — abstract:36289300 (study level; per-sample arms are in the intervention column below)

Samples at a glance
1 country
Age
adult380
Condition
healthy_control380
Country
IE380
Body site
primary380
Sequencing depth per sample · this project all projects
all projects, 0–0.03 Gbp: 25,080 samples (4 %)this project, 0–0.03 Gbp: 12 samplesall projects, 0.03–0.1 Gbp: 17,066 samples (3 %)this project, 0.03–0.1 Gbp: 20 samplesall projects, 0.1–0.3 Gbp: 29,179 samples (5 %)this project, 0.1–0.3 Gbp: 157 samplesall projects, 0.3–1 Gbp: 47,044 samples (8 %)this project, 0.3–1 Gbp: 172 samplesall projects, 1–3 Gbp: 124,983 samples (22 %)this project, 1–3 Gbp: 19 samplesall projects, 3–10 Gbp: 253,728 samples (44 %)all projects, 10–30 Gbp: 72,533 samples (13 %)all projects, 30–100 Gbp: 3,024 samples (1 %)all projects, 100–300 Gbp: 106 samples (0 %)all projects, ≥ 300 Gbp: 9 samples (0 %)project median 0.30 Gbp per sample0130Gbp
Sampling design and relatedness

longitudinal — not resolved

47 of 47 people sampled more than once (368 samples; median 8, up to 8 per person). Schedule stated by the source: “Samples collected pre- and post- a 4-week dietary intervention (baseline and ~4 weeks later)” (time origin: intervention start); stated follow-up 28 d.

How longitudinal and relatedness information is derived

Community composition
Faecalibacterium 10.0%Roseburia 7.5%Prevotella 4.9%Bacteroides 4.3%Blautia_A 3.4%Phocaeicola 3.4%Alistipes 2.9%Ruminococcoides 2.6%Gemmiger 2.3%Bifidobacterium 2.0%Vescimonas 1.7%Dialister 1.5%not assigned to a genus 25.1%other genera 28.5%

Genera, mean relative abundance over 311 profiled gut samples of this project (Sandpiper SingleM profiles, GTDB R232; low-depth and non-metagenome profiles left out).

Field coverage
fieldsamplescoverageR1R2R3R4
age_category380 100%
country380 100%380
health_condition380 100%380
subject_id368 97%368
antibiotic_exposure380 100%380
collection_date380 100%380
detailed_location380 100%
health_condition_detail380 100%380
location_locality380 100%380
intervention176 46%176
Papers (1)
  • Feed your microbes to deal with stress: a psychobiotic diet impacts microbial stability and perceived stress in a healthy adult population. 2023 PMID 36289300 PMC9908549 own_data
Details
Archive description

Both, the impact of diet on the microbiota composition as well as the regulation of the microbiota of brain processes, have been well established in the last decade. Additionally, there has been increasing emphasis on the role of diet in supporting optimal mental health. At the same time, psychobiotic interventions are emerging, salvaging the fact that the microbiota is modifiable by external factors. While probiotic and prebiotic interventions have shown promise as psychobiotic agents, whether whole dietary approaches can exert similar effects is largely understudied. Thus, we investigated the influence of a psychobiotic diet on the microbial profile and function as well as on stress and mood in a healthy human population. Forty five adults were randomized into either following a psychobiotic (n=24) or control (n=21) diet for 4 weeks. Microbiota composition and function was characterized using shotgun sequencing. Stress, mood, overall health and diet were assessed using standardized questionnaires. Metabolic profiling of plasma, urine and fecal samples was performed. Intervention with a psychobiotic diet resulted in reductions of perceived stress and an improvement in sleep quality. Additionally, higher adherence to the psychobiotic diet resulted in stronger decreases in perceived stress. Only subtle microbial compositional and functional changes were observed, but the dietary intervention elicited significant changes in the level of specific lipids in the faeces and urinary tryptophan metabolites. Lastly, microbial volatility was linked to greater changes in perceived stress scores in those on the psychobiotic diet. This data highlights that dietary approaches can be used to reduce stress in a human cohort, which holds promise in reducing the prevalence of stress-associated chronic diseases. However, additional research is warranted to investigate the role of the microbiota. Nevertheless, using healthy diets to positively modulate gut–brain communication holds possibilities for the reduction of stress and stress-associated disorders.

How this project entered the registry

Classified as human gut / stool shotgun DNA metagenome of adult by sonnet_x2 with confidence 0.75. Assay shotgun_dna.

  • host run.scientific_name · “Homo sapiens”
  • body site study.description · “plasma, urine and fecal samples”
  • life stage study.description · “Forty five adults were randomized”
Evidence examples (one per field × route)
samplefieldvaluerouteconf.sourcequote
SAMEA111391305antibiotic_exposurenoR30.70paper.fulltext.methodshad taken any pro-, pre- or antibiotic 4 weeks prior
SAMEA111391305collection_date2019R10.90biosample.attribute:collection_date2019
SAMEA111391305countryIER10.90sample.attr.geographic_location_country_and_or_seaIreland
SAMEA111391305health_conditionhealthy_controlR30.70paper.fulltext.methodsHealthy adult (male and female) participants with poor dietary habits
SAMEA111391305health_condition_detailHealthy adult participants with poor dietary habitsR30.70paper.fulltext.methodsHealthy adult (male and female) participants with poor dietary habits
SAMEA111391305interventionno_interventionR10.85biosample.attribute:descriptionCONT
SAMEA111391305location_localityCorkR30.70paper.fulltext.methodsrecruited from the Cork area
SAMEA111391305subject_id1R10.70sample.name_rule:alias1v2_S1_L001
Sequencing

380 runs over 380 samples · mean 0.35 Gbp per run (median 0.30 Gbp, total 132.38 Gbp; 380 runs with a base count) · layout PAIRED 380 · platform ILLUMINA 380 · models NextSeq 550 (380) · 82% of runs with a Sandpiper profile · first public 2022-09-23

Authors (12)

Berding K first · Bastiaanssen TFS · Moloney GM · Boscaini S · Strain CR · Anesi A · Long-Smith C · Mattivi F · Stanton C · Clarke G · Dinan TG · Cryan JF last

Downloads

PRJEB56264.csv.gz (8.5 KB) · parquet (82.1 KB) — all 380 samples, every field with route and confidence · PRJEB56264_determinations.csv.gz (16.8 KB) — 2,824 evidence rows

Samples (380 · every field this project has values for · hover a cell for its source)
Loading the sample table…