Home › Studies › PRJEB59861
PRJEB59861 ERP144906

Gut microbiome after RYGB vs sleeve gastrectomy, T2D, Norway

Microbiota alterations after gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy in patients with type 2 diabetes (Oseberg)

154 fecal samples from adult patients with type 2 diabetes in Norway, randomized to gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy; triple-blind randomized controlled trial comparing microbiome changes after surgery. machine-written summary

154 samples · 154 runs · NO · Adult · 2026 · 5.06 Gbp / sample

Sources
✓Sequence archive 1,077○Abstract / description✓Full text 616○Supplementary tables–External resources–User contribution–Human verified

Checked this project's papers and archive records yourself? Mark it human-verified.

what each source gave
✓ Sequence archive1,077 sample values (collection date, country, latitude, location region, longitude, subject id, timepoint)
○ Abstract / descriptionread; no usable statement
✓ Full text616 sample values (health condition, health condition detail, location locality, location site) · PMC13218940, PMC6561424
○ Supplementary tablesfiles read; no table could be matched to the samples
– External resourcesnot covered by the external resources we ingest
– User contributionnothing uploaded yet
– Human verifiednot yet checked by a person · I checked this project — verify it
Interventions

intervention — arms not resolved

Surgical procedure studied before/after (bariatric surgery design randomized_controlled_trial · population type2_diabetes · Gastric bypass (RYGB) vs sleeve gastrectomy (SG) for T2D

“randomized to either SG or RYGB” — bioproject.description (study level; per-sample arms are in the intervention column below)

Samples at a glance
1 sampling locations · 1 country
Age
adult154
Condition
type2_diabetes154
Country
NO154
Body site
primary154
Sequencing depth per sample · this project all projects
all projects, 0–0.03 Gbp: 25,080 samples (4 %)all projects, 0.03–0.1 Gbp: 17,066 samples (3 %)all projects, 0.1–0.3 Gbp: 29,179 samples (5 %)all projects, 0.3–1 Gbp: 47,044 samples (8 %)all projects, 1–3 Gbp: 124,983 samples (22 %)this project, 1–3 Gbp: 1 samplesall projects, 3–10 Gbp: 253,728 samples (44 %)this project, 3–10 Gbp: 153 samplesall projects, 10–30 Gbp: 72,533 samples (13 %)all projects, 30–100 Gbp: 3,024 samples (1 %)all projects, 100–300 Gbp: 106 samples (0 %)all projects, ≥ 300 Gbp: 9 samples (0 %)project median 5.06 Gbp per sample0130Gbp
Sampling design and relatedness

longitudinal

77 of 77 people sampled more than once (154 samples; median 2, up to 2 per person) · follow-up median 12 mo (max 12 mo) · median interval between samples 12 mo (time from timepoint labels). Schedule stated by the source: “faecal samples before and 12 months after surgery” (time origin: surgery); stated follow-up 12 mo.

100100: day 0100: day 365101101: day 0101: day 365103103: day 0103: day 365104104: day 0104: day 365105105: day 0105: day 365106106: day 0106: day 365107107: day 0107: day 365108108: day 0108: day 3651111: day 011: day 365110110: day 0110: day 365111111: day 0111: day 365112112: day 0112: day 365113113: day 0113: day 365114114: day 0114: day 365117117: day 0117: day 365118118: day 0118: day 3651212: day 012: day 365122122: day 0122: day 365123123: day 0123: day 365125125: day 0125: day 3651414: day 014: day 3651515: day 015: day 3651919: day 019: day 36522: day 02: day 3652020: day 020: day 3652222: day 022: day 3652626: day 026: day 3652727: day 027: day 3652828: day 028: day 3652929: day 029: day 36533: day 03: day 3653131: day 031: day 3653232: day 032: day 3653333: day 033: day 3653535: day 035: day 3653737: day 037: day 3650 d3 mo6 mo9 mo12 mo

Each row is one person (36 shown of 77); dots are samples at days since that person's first sample.

How longitudinal and relatedness information is derived

Community composition

No Sandpiper profile for this project's samples yet.

Field coverage
fieldsamplescoverageR1R2R3R4
age_category154 100%
country154 100%154
health_condition154 100%154
subject_id154 100%154
collection_date154 100%154
detailed_location154 100%
health_condition_detail154 100%154
latitude154 100%154
location_locality154 100%154
location_region154 100%154
location_site154 100%154
longitude154 100%154
timepoint_label153 99%153
Papers (3)
  • Single-centre, triple-blinded, randomised, 1-year, parallel-group, superiority study to compare the effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy on remission of type 2 diabetes and ß-cell function in subjects with morbid obesity: a protocol for the Obesity surgery in Tønsberg (Oseberg) study. 2019 PMID 31167860 PMC6561424 own_data
  • Gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy in patients with type 2 diabetes (Oseberg): a single-centre, triple-blind, randomised controlled trial. 2019 PMID 31678062 own_data
  • Gut microbiota responses to bariatric surgery are associated with metabolic outcomes and type 2 diabetes remission. 2026 PMID 42098417 PMC13218940 own_data
Details
Archive description

Bariatric surgery is the most efficient treatment for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and has been associated with changes in the gut microbiome. The altered gut microbiome observed after bariatric surgery is suggested to contribute to improved glucose metabolism in the host. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most common type of bariatric surgery, while gastric bypass (RYGB) has a higher frequency of T2D remission. Here we analyzed the fecal microbiome in patients with T2D randomized to either SG or RYGB in a triple-blind, randomized controlled trial. Both surgeries shifted the microbiome majorly in a similar direction, but RYGB produced larger shifts 1 year after surgery. The extent of microbiome change was associated with higher circulating GLP-1 levels and beta-cell function following surgery, independent of weight loss. The functional potential of the microbiota was also altered, along with shift in fermentation products, in both surgery types. We observed decreased potential for carbohydrate degradation in the post-bariatric surgery microbiome, with accompanying increase in potential for butyrate production, especially from amino acids such as lysine. Both surgeries were associated with increased gene richness and methanogenic Archaea, while RYGB was associated with increased relative abundance of Escherichia spp. following surgery. Both increased shift in fermentation products and higher increase in gene richness, and larger increase in potential for butyrate production from amino acids was linked to T2D remission. Increased abundance of Archaea and gene richness that previously been associated with metabolic health. These shifts indicates that the gut maintains an anaerobic environment following surgery and suggest that microbial adaptations to the altered milieu following surgery may contribute to metabolic improvements in the host.

How this project entered the registry

Classified as human gut / stool shotgun DNA metagenome of adult by sonnet_x2 with confidence 0.78. Assay shotgun_dna.

  • host run.scientific_name · “Homo sapiens”
  • body site study.description · “fecal microbiome in patients with T2D”
  • life stage study.description · “patients with T2D randomized”
Evidence examples (one per field × route)
samplefieldvaluerouteconf.sourcequote
SAMEA112655990collection_date2017R10.90biosample.attribute:collection_date2017
SAMEA112655990countryNOR10.90sample.attr.geographic_location_country_and_or_seaNorway
SAMEA112655990health_conditiontype2_diabetesR30.70paper.fulltext.abstractindividuals with obesity and type 2 diabetes
SAMEA112655990health_condition_detailindividuals with obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D)R30.70paper.fulltext.abstractindividuals with obesity and type 2 diabetes
SAMEA112655990latitude59.2675R10.90biosample.attribute:geographic_location_latitude+geographic_location_longitude59.26754 10.40762
SAMEA112655990location_localityTønsbergR30.70paper.fulltext.methodsVestfold Hospital Trust (Tønsberg, Norway)
SAMEA112655990location_regionVestfoldR10.60biosample.attribute:geographic_location_latitude+geographic_location_longitude59.26754 10.40762
SAMEA112655990location_siteVestfold Hospital TrustR30.70paper.fulltext.methodsconducted at Vestfold Hospital Trust (Tønsberg, Norway)
SAMEA112655990longitude10.4076R10.90biosample.attribute:geographic_location_latitude+geographic_location_longitude59.26754 10.40762
SAMEA112655990subject_id2R10.70sample.name_rule:alias2_12M
SAMEA112655990timepoint_label12 monthsR10.70sample.name_rule:alias2_12M
Sequencing

154 runs over 154 samples · mean 5.23 Gbp per run (median 5.06 Gbp, total 805.95 Gbp; 154 runs with a base count) · layout PAIRED 154 · platform ILLUMINA 154 · models NextSeq 500 (154) · 0% of runs with a Sandpiper profile · first public 2026-03-03

Authors (32)

Borgeraas H first · Hjelmesæth J · Birkeland KI · Fatima F · Grimnes JO · Gulseth HL · Halvorsen E · Hertel JK · Hillestad TOW · Johnson LK · Karlsen TI · Kolotkin RL · Kvan NP · Lindberg M · Lorentzen J · Nordstrand N · Sandbu R · Seeberg KA · Seip B · Svanevik M · Valderhaug TG · Hofsø D last · Cvancarova Småstuen M · Stefanovski D · Gretland Valderhaug T · Olsson LM first · Chakaroun RM · Dwibedi C · Mitteregger M · Holst JJ · Tremaroli V · Bäckhed F last

Downloads

PRJEB59861.csv.gz (5.2 KB) · parquet (76.9 KB) — all 154 samples, every field with route and confidence · PRJEB59861_determinations.csv.gz (10.9 KB) — 1,693 evidence rows

Samples (154 · every field this project has values for · hover a cell for its source)
Loading the sample table…