Home › Studies › PRJEB8347
PRJEB8347 ERP009422

Longitudinal gut metagenome stability in German adults

Temporal and technical variability of human gut metagenomes

70 fecal metagenome samples from adults in Germany, collected longitudinally to assess temporal and technical (preservation method) variability, including monitored antibiotic treatment and bowel preparation interventions in one subject. machine-written summary

70 samples · 566 runs · DE · Adult · 2015 · 5.43 Gbp / sample · cohort Surgical Treatment for Colorectal Cancer Partially

Sources
✓Sequence archive 350○Abstract / description✓Full text 140✓Supplementary tables 76–External resources–User contribution–Human verified

Checked this project's papers and archive records yourself? Mark it human-verified.

what each source gave
✓ Sequence archive350 sample values (bmi, collection date, country, sex, subject id)
○ Abstract / descriptionread; no usable statement
✓ Full text140 sample values (location locality, location site) · PMC4416267, PMC6070150, PMC9040882, PMC9249589
✓ Supplementary tables76 sample values (age, timepoint)
– External resourcesnot covered by the external resources we ingest
– User contributionnothing uploaded yet
– Human verifiednot yet checked by a person · I checked this project — verify it
Interventions

intervention — arms not resolved

Antibiotic given as the study intervention (incl. eradication therapy Bowel cleansing / colonoscopy preparation design single_arm_before_after · population healthy_control · Antibiotic treatment and bowel cleansing in one subject

“antibiotic treatment and bowel cleansing” — bioproject.description (study level; per-sample arms are in the intervention column below)

Samples at a glance
1 country
Age
adult70
Sex
male62
female8
Country
DE70
Body site
primary70
Sequencing depth per sample · this project all projects
all projects, 0–0.03 Gbp: 25,080 samples (4 %)all projects, 0.03–0.1 Gbp: 17,066 samples (3 %)all projects, 0.1–0.3 Gbp: 29,179 samples (5 %)all projects, 0.3–1 Gbp: 47,044 samples (8 %)all projects, 1–3 Gbp: 124,983 samples (22 %)this project, 1–3 Gbp: 4 samplesall projects, 3–10 Gbp: 253,728 samples (44 %)this project, 3–10 Gbp: 59 samplesall projects, 10–30 Gbp: 72,533 samples (13 %)this project, 10–30 Gbp: 7 samplesall projects, 30–100 Gbp: 3,024 samples (1 %)all projects, 100–300 Gbp: 106 samples (0 %)all projects, ≥ 300 Gbp: 9 samples (0 %)project median 5.43 Gbp per sample0130Gbp
Sampling design and relatedness

longitudinal

7 of 7 people sampled more than once (70 samples; median 7, up to 21 per person) · follow-up median 2.0 y (max 2.0 y) · median interval between samples 12 mo (time from age at collection). Schedule stated by the source: “Same 7 subjects sampled at d0,2,7,60,392,600,773; one subject (Alien) added samples after antibiotics (d376-380) and bowel cleanse (d630-637)” (time origin: first sampling event (enrolment)); stated follow-up 2.1 y.

alienalien: day 0alien: day 0alien: day 0alien: day 0alien: day 0alien: day 0alien: day 365alien: day 365alien: day 365alien: day 365alien: day 365alien: day 365alien: day 365alien: day 365alien: day 365alien: day 365alien: day 730alien: day 730alien: day 730alien: day 730alien: day 730bugkillerbugkiller: day 0bugkiller: day 0bugkiller: day 0bugkiller: day 0bugkiller: day 0bugkiller: day 0bugkiller: day 365bugkiller: day 365bugkiller: day 365bugkiller: day 365bugkiller: day 365bugkiller: day 365bugkiller: day 731bugkiller: day 731halbaradhalbarad: day 0halbarad: day 0halbarad: day 0halbarad: day 0halbarad: day 0halbarad: day 366peacemakerpeacemaker: day 0peacemaker: day 0peacemaker: day 0peacemaker: day 0peacemaker: day 0peacemaker: day 0peacemaker: day 365peacemaker: day 365peacemaker: day 365peacemaker: day 365peacemaker: day 365peacemaker: day 365peacemaker: day 365peacemaker: day 731scavengerscavenger: day 0scavenger: day 0scavenger: day 0scavenger: day 0scavenger: day 0scavenger: day 0scavenger: day 3650 d6 mo12 mo18 mo2.0 y

Each row is one person (5 shown of 7); dots are samples at days since that person's first sample.

How longitudinal and relatedness information is derived

Community composition
Phocaeicola 11.0%Roseburia 9.3%Bacteroides 9.3%Faecalibacterium 8.3%Prevotella 8.2%Lachnospira 7.0%Parabacteroides 6.2%Alistipes 2.0%Gemmiger 2.0%Bifidobacterium 1.7%Ruminococcoides 1.2%Blautia_A 1.2%not assigned to a genus 10.5%other genera 22.2%

Genera, mean relative abundance over 68 profiled gut samples of this project (Sandpiper SingleM profiles, GTDB R232; low-depth and non-metagenome profiles left out).

Field coverage
fieldsamplescoverageR1R2R3R4
age_category70 100%
country70 100%70
health_condition0 0%
subject_id70 100%70
age_at_collection_days70 100%70
bmi70 100%70
collection_date70 100%70
detailed_location70 100%
location_locality70 100%70
location_site70 100%70
sex70 100%70
timepoint_label6 9%6
Papers (9)
4 more
  • Extensive transmission of microbes along the gastrointestinal tract. 2019 PMID 30747106 PMC6424576
  • Human Gut Microbiome Aging Clock Based on Taxonomic Profiling and Deep Learning. 2020 PMID 32534441 PMC7298543
  • Separation of Donor and Recipient Microbial Diversity Allows Determination of Taxonomic and Functional Features of Gut Microbiota Restructuring following Fecal Transplantation. 2021 PMID 34402648 PMC8407411
  • KOMB: K-core based de novo characterization of copy number variation in microbiomes. 2022 PMID 35832621 PMC9249589
Details
Archive description

Background: Metagenomics has become a prominent approach for exploring the role of the gut microbiota in human health. However, the temporal variability of the healthy gut microbiome has not yet been studied in depth using metagenomics and little is known about the effects of different sampling and preservation approaches. We performed metagenomic analysis on fecal samples from seven subjects collected over a period of up to two years to investigate temporal variability and assess preservation-induced variation, specifically, fresh frozen compared to RNALater. We also monitored short-term disturbances caused by antibiotic treatment and bowel cleansing in one subject. Results: We find that the human gut microbiome is temporally stable and highly personalized at both taxonomic and functional levels. Over multiple time-points, samples from the same subject clustered together, even in the context of a large dataset of 888 European and American fecal metagenomes. One exception was observed in an antibiotic intervention case where, more than one year after the treatment, samples did not resemble the pre-treatment state. Clustering was not affected by preservation method. No species differed significantly in abundance, and only 0.36% of gene families were differentially abundant between preservation methods. Conclusions: Technical variability is small compared to the temporal variability of an unperturbed gut microbiome, which in turn is much smaller than the observed between-subject variability. Thus, short-term preservation of fecal samples in RNALater is an appropriate and cost-effective alternative to freezing of fecal samples for metagenomic studies.

How this project entered the registry

Classified as human gut / stool shotgun DNA metagenome of adult by sonnet_x2 with confidence 0.65. Assay shotgun_dna.

  • host run.scientific_name · “human gut metagenome”
  • body site study.description · “fecal samples from seven subjects”
  • life stage study.description · “gut microbiota in human health”
Evidence examples (one per field × route)
samplefieldvaluerouteconf.sourcequote
SAMEA3231299age_at_collection_days17532R20.85paper.supp.13059_2015_639_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx[Metadata!Age (years)]48
SAMEA3231299bmi26.3R10.90sample.attr.body_mass_index26,3
SAMEA3231299collection_date2011/2014R10.90biosample.attribute:collection_date2011/2014
SAMEA3231299countryDER10.90sample.attr.geographic_location_country_and_or_sea_regionGermany
SAMEA3231299location_localityHeidelbergR30.70paper.fulltext.methodsliving in Heidelberg, Germany at the beginning of the study
SAMEA3231299location_sitemy.microbes projectR30.70paper.fulltext.methodsthrough the my.microbes project
SAMEA3231299sexmaleR10.90sample.attr.sexmale
SAMEA3231299subject_idalienR10.85sample.attr.host_subject_idalien
SAMEA3231332timepoint_label173R20.85paper.supp.msystems.00018-22-st001.xlsx[Table_S1-6!Days]173
Sequencing

566 runs over 70 samples · mean 0.74 Gbp per run (median 0.34 Gbp, total 418.87 Gbp; 566 runs with a base count) · layout PAIRED 285, SINGLE 281 · platform ILLUMINA 566 · models Illumina HiSeq 2000 (566) · 55% of runs with a Sandpiper profile · first public 2015-03-16

Authors (60)

Costea PI first · Coelho LP · Sunagawa S · Munch R · Huerta-Cepas J · Forslund K · Hildebrand F · Kushugulova A · Zeller G · Bork P last · Wang Z first · Lou H · Wang Y · Shamir R · Jiang R · Chen T last · Galkin F first · Mamoshina P · Aliper A · Lane E · Moskalev V · Gladyshev VN · Zhavoronkov A last · Olekhnovich EI first · Ivanov AB · Ulyantsev VI · Ilina EN last · Balaji A first · Sapoval N · Seto C · Leo Elworth RA · Fu Y · Nute MG · Savidge T · Segarra S · Treangen TJ last · Argentini C first · Lugli GA · Tarracchini C · Fontana F · Mancabelli L · Viappiani A · Anzalone R · Angelini L · Alessandri G · Longhi G · Bianchi MG · Taurino G · Bussolati O · Milani C · van Sinderen D · Turroni F · Ventura M last · Valguarnera E first · Tung J · Pak JJ · Russell SK · Hecht DW · Schwartz DJ · Wardenburg JB last

Downloads

PRJEB8347.csv.gz (2.8 KB) · parquet (73.4 KB) — all 70 samples, every field with route and confidence · PRJEB8347_determinations.csv.gz (3.6 KB) — 566 evidence rows

Samples (70 · every field this project has values for · hover a cell for its source)
Loading the sample table…