Home › Studies › PRJNA1000186
PRJNA1000186 SRP548329

Diet and L. reuteri probiotic crossover trial, Edmonton, Canada

Microbiome restoration using a non-industrialized-type diet and a lost microbe

118 fecal samples from healthy adults in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, from a randomized crossover trial testing a non-industrialized-type (Restore) diet combined with L. reuteri probiotic strains versus usual diet and placebo. machine-written summary

118 samples · 118 runs · CA · Adult · 2025 · 9.62 Gbp / sample

Sources
✓Sequence archive 826✓Abstract / description 236○Full text○Supplementary tables–External resources–User contribution–Human verified

Checked this project's papers and archive records yourself? Mark it human-verified.

what each source gave
✓ Sequence archive826 sample values (collection date, country, latitude, location locality, location region, longitude, subject id)
✓ Abstract / description236 sample values (health condition, health condition detail)
○ Full textread; no usable statement or table · PMC11380787
○ Supplementary tablesfiles read; no table could be matched to the samples
– External resourcesnot covered by the external resources we ingest
– User contributionnothing uploaded yet
– Human verifiednot yet checked by a person · I checked this project — verify it
Interventions

intervention — arms not resolved

Controlled / prescribed diet or feeding regimen Probiotic (live microorganisms; single strain or mixture) design crossover · population healthy_control · Non-industrialized high-fiber Restore diet vs usual diet; L. reuteri PB-W1 or DSM20016T vs placebo

“randomized crossover trial in healthy Canadian adults” — bioproject.description (study level; per-sample arms are in the intervention column below)

Samples at a glance
1 sampling locations · 1 country
Age
adult118
Condition
healthy_control118
Country
CA118
Body site
primary118
Sequencing depth per sample · this project all projects
all projects, 0–0.03 Gbp: 25,080 samples (4 %)all projects, 0.03–0.1 Gbp: 17,066 samples (3 %)all projects, 0.1–0.3 Gbp: 29,179 samples (5 %)all projects, 0.3–1 Gbp: 47,044 samples (8 %)all projects, 1–3 Gbp: 124,983 samples (22 %)all projects, 3–10 Gbp: 253,728 samples (44 %)this project, 3–10 Gbp: 74 samplesall projects, 10–30 Gbp: 72,533 samples (13 %)this project, 10–30 Gbp: 43 samplesall projects, 30–100 Gbp: 3,024 samples (1 %)this project, 30–100 Gbp: 1 samplesall projects, 100–300 Gbp: 106 samples (0 %)all projects, ≥ 300 Gbp: 9 samples (0 %)project median 9.62 Gbp per sample0130Gbp
Sampling design and relatedness

longitudinal

30 of 30 people sampled more than once (118 samples; median 4, up to 4 per person) · follow-up median 2 mo (max 2 mo) · median interval between samples 31 d (time from collection months (month precision)).

0101: day 001: day 2801: day 5901: day 590202: day 002: day 2802: day 5902: day 590303: day 003: day 2803: day 5903: day 590404: day 004: day 2804: day 5904: day 590505: day 005: day 005: day 3105: day 610606: day 006: day 006: day 3106: day 610707: day 007: day 007: day 3107: day 610808: day 008: day 008: day 3108: day 611010: day 010: day 010: day 6110: day 611111: day 011: day 011: day 6111: day 611212: day 012: day 012: day 6112: day 611313: day 013: day 013: day 6113: day 611414: day 014: day 014: day 6114: day 611616: day 016: day 016: day 6116: day 611717: day 017: day 017: day 6117: day 611818: day 018: day 018: day 6118: day 612121: day 021: day 021: day 3121: day 612525: day 025: day 025: day 3125: day 612626: day 026: day 026: day 3026: day 612727: day 027: day 027: day 3127: day 612828: day 028: day 028: day 3128: day 613030: day 030: day 030: day 3030: day 613131: day 031: day 031: day 3031: day 613232: day 032: day 032: day 3032: day 613333: day 033: day 033: day 3033: day 613434: day 034: day 3034: day 6134: day 613737: day 037: day 037: day 3137: day 613838: day 038: day 038: day 3138: day 614141: day 041: day 041: day 3141: day 610 d15 d30 d46 d2 mo

Each row is one person (29 shown of 30); dots are samples at days since that person's first sample.

How longitudinal and relatedness information is derived

Community composition
Faecalibacterium 12.0%Roseburia 9.7%Prevotella 6.1%Bifidobacterium 5.7%Alistipes 4.3%Bacteroides 3.4%Ruminococcoides 3.1%Hominicoprocola 2.7%Fusicatenibacter 2.5%Blautia_A 2.5%Phocaeicola 2.4%CAG-103 2.2%not assigned to a genus 5.3%other genera 38.2%

Genera, mean relative abundance over 110 profiled gut samples of this project (Sandpiper SingleM profiles, GTDB R232; low-depth and non-metagenome profiles left out).

Field coverage
fieldsamplescoverageR1R2R3R4
age_category118 100%
country118 100%118
health_condition118 100%118
subject_id118 100%118
collection_date118 100%118
detailed_location118 100%
health_condition_detail118 100%118
latitude118 100%118
location_locality118 100%118
location_region118 100%118
longitude118 100%118
Papers (1)
  • Highly accurate and sensitive absolute quantification of bacterial strains in human fecal samples. 2024 PMID 39244633 PMC11380787 own_data
Details
Archive description

Increased chronic disease prevalence in industrialized societies may be partially driven by western-style dietary patterns disrupting the gut microbiome. We explored the effects of a microbiome restoration strategy comprised of a non-industrialized-type (Restore) diet (providing ~45 grams/day dietary fiber) and a probiotic species Limosilactobacillus reuteri (a microbe rarely found in industrialized microbiomes) on gut microbiome ecology and host physiology. In a randomized crossover trial in healthy Canadian adults, 30 participants consumed the Restore diet or their usual diet for three weeks. Participants also consumed a single dose of either L. reuteri PB-W1 (an isolate from rural Papua New Guinea), L. reuteri DSM20016T (type strain of the species), or a placebo in each diet period.

How this project entered the registry

Classified as human gut / stool shotgun DNA metagenome of adult by sonnet_x2 with confidence 0.75. Assay shotgun_dna.

  • host run.host_tax_id · “9606”
  • body site study.description · “gut microbiome ecology and host physiology”
  • life stage study.description · “healthy Canadian adults, 30 participants”
Evidence examples (one per field × route)
samplefieldvaluerouteconf.sourcequote
SAMN45096721collection_date2019-02R10.90biosample.attribute:collection_date2019-02
SAMN45096721countryCAR10.90sample.attr.geo_loc_nameCanada:Alberta,Edmonton
SAMN45096721health_conditionhealthy_controlR40.50study.descriptionhealthy Canadian adults
SAMN45096721health_condition_detailAll participants explicitly described as healthy.R40.50study.descriptionhealthy Canadian adults
SAMN45096721latitude53.5227R10.90biosample.attribute:lat_lon53.52273152 N 113.52139357 W
SAMN45096721location_localityEdmontonR10.85biosample.attribute:geo_loc_nameCanada:Alberta,Edmonton
SAMN45096721location_regionAlbertaR10.85biosample.attribute:geo_loc_nameCanada:Alberta,Edmonton
SAMN45096721longitude-113.5214R10.90biosample.attribute:lat_lon53.52273152 N 113.52139357 W
SAMN45096721subject_id01R10.70sample.name_rule:aliasRW_01_Day0_P1
Sequencing

118 runs over 118 samples · mean 10.37 Gbp per run (median 9.62 Gbp, total 1,223.29 Gbp; 118 runs with a base count) · layout PAIRED 118 · platform ILLUMINA 118 · models Illumina NovaSeq 6000 (118) · 93% of runs with a Sandpiper profile · first public 2025-01-29

Authors (6)

Li F first · Liu J · Maldonado-Gómez MX · Frese SA · Gänzle MG · Walter J last

Downloads

PRJNA1000186.csv.gz (4.0 KB) · parquet (74.9 KB) — all 118 samples, every field with route and confidence · PRJNA1000186_determinations.csv.gz (7.5 KB) — 1,062 evidence rows

Samples (118 · every field this project has values for · hover a cell for its source)
Loading the sample table…