Home › Studies › PRJNA1191223
PRJNA1191223 SRP559839

Preterm infant gut microbiome: antibiotics vs probiotics, UK

Impact of early life antibiotic and probiotic treatment on gut microbiome and resistome of preterm infants (metagenome samples)

92 longitudinal faecal metagenome samples from very-low-birth-weight preterm infants in London and Norwich, UK, studying antibiotic and probiotic effects on gut microbiome/resistome in a nonrandomized longitudinal cohort design. machine-written summary

92 samples · 92 runs · GB · Infant / toddler · 2025 · 1.41 Gbp / sample

Sources
✓Sequence archive 460○Abstract / description✓Full text 184✓Supplementary tables 184–External resources–User contribution–Human verified

Checked this project's papers and archive records yourself? Mark it human-verified.

what each source gave
✓ Sequence archive460 sample values (collection date, country, intervention, subject id, timepoint)
○ Abstract / descriptionread; no usable statement
✓ Full text184 sample values (feeding mode, preterm status) · PMC12354744
✓ Supplementary tables184 sample values (antibiotic exposure, gestational age weeks)
– External resourcesnot covered by the external resources we ingest
– User contributionnothing uploaded yet
– Human verifiednot yet checked by a person · I checked this project — verify it
Interventions

intervention · arms resolved

EProbiotic (live microorganisms; single strain or mixture): 22 people · 39 samplesprobiotic 22 people · 39 samplesControl / pre-intervention baseline (sample level only): 29 people · 53 samplesno intervention 29 people · 53 samples
exposed vs. not exposed (observational)

5 people have samples in more than one arm.

Antibiotic given as the study intervention (incl. eradication therapy Probiotic (live microorganisms; single strain or mixture) design observational_with_procedure · population preterm_nicu · Probiotic (Bifidobacterium) cohort vs non-probiotic; antibiotics benzylpenicillin/gentamicin in some infants

“one cohort receiving probiotics” — bioproject.description (study level; per-sample arms are in the intervention column below)

Samples at a glance
1 country
Age
infant92
Country
GB92
Body site
primary92
Collected 2012–2016
2012: 53 samples2016: 39 samples20122016
Sequencing depth per sample · this project all projects
all projects, 0–0.03 Gbp: 25,080 samples (4 %)all projects, 0.03–0.1 Gbp: 17,066 samples (3 %)all projects, 0.1–0.3 Gbp: 29,179 samples (5 %)all projects, 0.3–1 Gbp: 47,044 samples (8 %)this project, 0.3–1 Gbp: 2 samplesall projects, 1–3 Gbp: 124,983 samples (22 %)this project, 1–3 Gbp: 90 samplesall projects, 3–10 Gbp: 253,728 samples (44 %)all projects, 10–30 Gbp: 72,533 samples (13 %)all projects, 30–100 Gbp: 3,024 samples (1 %)all projects, 100–300 Gbp: 106 samples (0 %)all projects, ≥ 300 Gbp: 9 samples (0 %)project median 1.41 Gbp per sample0130Gbp
Sampling design and relatedness

longitudinal

46 of 46 people sampled more than once (92 samples; median 2, up to 2 per person) · follow-up median 7 d (max 14 d) · median interval between samples 7 d (time from timepoint labels). Schedule stated by the source: “Each infant sampled at up to 3 weekly timepoints (W1, W2, W3); median 2, max 2 samples per subject.”.

1010: day 010: day 71111: day 011: day 71212: day 012: day 71313: day 013: day 141414: day 014: day 71515: day 015: day 71616: day 016: day 141717: day 017: day 71818: day 018: day 72727: day 027: day 142828: day 028: day 72929: day 029: day 73030: day 030: day 73131: day 031: day 73333: day 033: day 73434: day 034: day 143535: day 035: day 73636: day 036: day 73737: day 037: day 143838: day 038: day 73939: day 039: day 74040: day 040: day 74141: day 041: day 74242: day 042: day 144343: day 043: day 74444: day 044: day 74545: day 045: day 74646: day 046: day 799: day 09: day 140 d4 d7 d10 d14 d

Each row is one person (29 shown of 46); dots are samples at days since that person's first sample.

How longitudinal and relatedness information is derived

Community composition
Bifidobacterium 39.4%Escherichia 10.9%Klebsiella 10.7%Staphylococcus 9.9%Enterobacter 9.1%Enterococcus 6.6%Streptococcus 4.8%Veillonella 2.7%Cutibacterium 0.9%Lactobacillus 0.5%Haemophilus_D 0.3%Sarcina 0.3%not assigned to a genus 2.0%other genera 2.0%

Genera, mean relative abundance over 90 profiled gut samples of this project (Sandpiper SingleM profiles, GTDB R232; low-depth and non-metagenome profiles left out).

Field coverage
fieldsamplescoverageR1R2R3R4
age_category92 100%
country92 100%92
health_condition0 0%
subject_id92 100%92
antibiotic_exposure92 100%92
collection_date92 100%92
feeding_mode92 100%92
gestational_age_weeks92 100%92
intervention92 100%92
preterm_status92 100%92
timepoint_label92 100%92
Papers (1)
  • Impact of early life antibiotic and probiotic treatment on gut microbiome and resistome of very-low-birth-weight preterm infants. PMID 40813371 PMC12354744 curated
Details
Archive description

Preterm infants (<37 weeks gestation) are often administered broad-spectrum antibiotics in hospitals due to their vulnerability to severe infections, including necrotising enterocolitis and sepsis. However, antibiotics can disrupt the development of early-life microbiota, potentially impairing gut immunity and colonisation resistance. Evidence shows that probiotics (e.g., Bifidobacterium) may help restore healthy gut microbiota. In this study, we examined the effects of probiotics and antibiotics on the preterm gut microbiome and resistome in two unique cohorts of 34 very-low-birth-weight, human-milk-fed preterm infants (moderate to very preterm), with one cohort receiving probiotics. Within each group, some infants were treated with antibiotics (benzylpenicillin and/or gentamicin) while others served as controls. We performed shotgun metagenome sequencing on 93 longitudinal faecal samples, generated >300 metagenome-assembled genomes, and obtained ~90 isolate genomes through targeted culturomics, enabling analysis of the microbiome/resistome at species and strain levels. Additionally, we investigated in vitro horizontal gene transfer (HGT) capacity of the multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogen Enterococcus via infant gut models. Overall, probiotic supplementation significantly reduced antibiotic resistance gene prevalence, MDR pathogen load, and helped restore a typical early-life microbiota. However, the persistence of MDR pathogens like Enterococcus, with high HGT potential, highlights the need for ongoing surveillance in neonatal care. Our findings underscore the complex interactions among antibiotics, probiotics, and HGT in shaping the neonatal microbiome and support further research into probiotics for antimicrobial stewardship in preterm populations.

How this project entered the registry

Classified as human gut / stool / human milk shotgun DNA metagenome of infant / toddler and neonate by deterministic_prior with confidence 0.90. Assay shotgun_dna.

  • host external_curation.infant_catalog · “infant triage verdict include”
  • body site study.title · “probiotic treatment on gut microbiome and resistome”
  • body site study.description · “microbiota, potentially impairing gut immunity and colonisation”
  • body site study.description · “of 34 very-low-birth-weight, human-milk -fed preterm infants”
  • life stage external_curation.infant_catalog · “infant triage verdict include (0-3 y scope)”
  • life stage study.title · “Impact of early life antibiotic and probiotic”
  • life stage study.title · “and resistome of preterm infants (metagenome samples)”
  • life stage study.description · “Preterm infants (<37 weeks”
Evidence examples (one per field × route)
samplefieldvaluerouteconf.sourcequote
SAMN46357202antibiotic_exposurenoR20.85paper.supp.tableAntibiotic=No
SAMN46357202collection_date2012R10.85biosample.attribute:collection_datecollection_date: 2012
SAMN46357202countryGBR10.90biosample_attrUnited Kingdom: London
SAMN46357202feeding_modeexclusive_breastR30.40paper.fulltext.methodsinfants were all fed with breastmilk and/or donor breastmilk
SAMN46357202gestational_age_weeks28.0R20.85paper.supp.tableGestational Age=28
SAMN46357202interventionno_interventionR10.70sample.name_rule:sample_aliasN01-W1
SAMN46357202preterm_statuspretermR30.80paper.fulltext.abstract34 very-low-birth-weight, human-milk-fed preterm infants
SAMN46357202subject_id22R10.70run.library_name21989_5#22
SAMN46357202timepoint_labelW1R10.70sample.titleGut metagenome of preterm infant N01-W1
Sequencing

92 runs over 92 samples · mean 1.42 Gbp per run (median 1.41 Gbp, total 130.99 Gbp; 92 runs with a base count) · layout PAIRED 92 · platform ILLUMINA 92 · models Illumina HiSeq 2500 (92) · 98% of runs with a Sandpiper profile · first public 2025-09-21

Authors (13)

Kiu R first · Darby EM · Alcon-Giner C · Acuna-Gonzalez A · Camargo A · Lamberte LE · Phillips S · Sim K · Shaw AG · Clarke P · van Schaik W · Kroll JS · Hall LJ last

Downloads

PRJNA1191223.csv.gz (3.5 KB) · parquet (74.1 KB) — all 92 samples, every field with route and confidence · PRJNA1191223_determinations.csv.gz (7.2 KB) — 828 evidence rows

Samples (92 · every field this project has values for · hover a cell for its source)
Loading the sample table…