Home › Studies › PRJNA243036
PRJNA243036 SRP040956

DNA extraction method comparison in faecal samples, Denmark

Choice of method for purification of bacterial DNA from faecal material influences community structure as detected by next generation sequencing

24 faecal samples from healthy controls in Copenhagen, Denmark, used to compare MetaHIT vs. HMP DNA extraction protocols and assess effects of sample homogenization on bacterial community structure. machine-written summary

24 samples · 48 runs · DK · Age unknown · 2014 · 7.04 Gbp / sample

Sources
✓Sequence archive 162○Abstract / description✓Full text 48○Supplementary tables–External resources–User contribution–Human verified

Checked this project's papers and archive records yourself? Mark it human-verified.

what each source gave
✓ Sequence archive162 sample values (collection date, country, latitude, location locality, location region, longitude, subject id)
○ Abstract / descriptionread; no usable statement
✓ Full text48 sample values (health condition, health condition detail) · PMC4063427
○ Supplementary tablesfiles read; no table could be matched to the samples
– External resourcesnot covered by the external resources we ingest
– User contributionnothing uploaded yet
– Human verifiednot yet checked by a person · I checked this project — verify it
Samples at a glance
1 sampling locations · 1 country
Age
unknown24
Condition
healthy_control24
Country
DK24
Body site
primary24
Sequencing depth per sample · this project all projects
all projects, 0–0.03 Gbp: 25,080 samples (4 %)all projects, 0.03–0.1 Gbp: 17,066 samples (3 %)all projects, 0.1–0.3 Gbp: 29,179 samples (5 %)all projects, 0.3–1 Gbp: 47,044 samples (8 %)all projects, 1–3 Gbp: 124,983 samples (22 %)all projects, 3–10 Gbp: 253,728 samples (44 %)this project, 3–10 Gbp: 24 samplesall projects, 10–30 Gbp: 72,533 samples (13 %)all projects, 30–100 Gbp: 3,024 samples (1 %)all projects, 100–300 Gbp: 106 samples (0 %)all projects, ≥ 300 Gbp: 9 samples (0 %)project median 7.04 Gbp per sample0130Gbp
Sampling design and relatedness

longitudinal — not resolved

3 of 3 people sampled more than once (18 samples; median 6, up to 6 per person).

How longitudinal and relatedness information is derived

Community composition
Faecalibacterium 10.3%Roseburia 7.8%Prevotella 5.2%Alistipes 4.0%Bacteroides 4.0%Blautia_A 3.7%Ruminococcoides 3.5%Bifidobacterium 2.5%Phocaeicola 2.4%Vescimonas 2.2%Acetatifactor 2.1%Fusicatenibacter 2.0%not assigned to a genus 6.1%other genera 44.3%

Genera, mean relative abundance over 24 profiled gut samples of this project (Sandpiper SingleM profiles, GTDB R232; low-depth and non-metagenome profiles left out).

Field coverage
fieldsamplescoverageR1R2R3R4
age_category0 0%
country24 100%24
health_condition24 100%24
subject_id18 75%18
collection_date24 100%24
detailed_location24 100%
health_condition_detail24 100%24
latitude24 100%24
location_locality24 100%24
location_region24 100%24
longitude24 100%24
Papers (1)
  • Choice of bacterial DNA extraction method from fecal material influences community structure as evaluated by metagenomic analysis. 2014 PMID 24949196 PMC4063427 own_data
Details
Archive description

In this study we conducted a systematic comparison of the DNA extraction methods on feacal samples used by the two major collaborative efforts: The European MetaHIT and the American Human Microbiome Project. Additionally, effects of homogenizing the samples before extraction were addressed. We observed significant differences in distribution of bacterial taxa depending on the method. While eukaryotic DNA was most efficiently extracted by the MetaHIT protocol, DNA from bacteria within the Bacteroidetes phylum was most efficiently extracted by the HMP protocol. Whereas it is comforting that the inter-individual variation clearly exceeded the variation resulting from choice of extraction method, our data highlights the challenge of comparing data across studies applying different methodologies.

How this project entered the registry

Classified as human gut / stool shotgun DNA metagenome of age unknown by sonnet_x2 with confidence 0.78. Assay shotgun_dna.

  • host run.host_tax_id · “9606”
  • body site run.scientific_name · “human gut metagenome”
  • body site study.description · “purification of bacterial DNA from faecal material”
Evidence examples (one per field × route)
samplefieldvaluerouteconf.sourcequote
SAMN02711295collection_date2012R10.90biosample.attribute:collection_date2012
SAMN02711295countryDKR10.90sample.attr.geo_loc_nameDenmark: Copenhagen
SAMN02711295health_conditionhealthy_controlR30.70paper.fulltext.methodsprocessed from three healthy human volunteers within 4 hours
SAMN02711295health_condition_detailhealthy human volunteersR30.70paper.fulltext.methodsprocessed from three healthy human volunteers within 4 hours
SAMN02711295latitude55.6800R10.90biosample.attribute:lat_lon55.68 N 12.57 E
SAMN02711295location_localityCopenhagenR10.85biosample.attribute:geo_loc_nameDenmark: Copenhagen
SAMN02711295location_regionCapital RegionR10.60biosample.attribute:lat_lon55.68 N 12.57 E
SAMN02711295longitude12.5700R10.90biosample.attribute:lat_lon55.68 N 12.57 E
SAMN02711295subject_idAR10.85biosample.attribute:test_personA
Sequencing

48 runs over 24 samples · mean 3.50 Gbp per run (median 3.52 Gbp, total 167.87 Gbp; 48 runs with a base count) · layout PAIRED 48 · platform ILLUMINA 48 · models Illumina HiSeq 2000 (48) · 92% of runs with a Sandpiper profile · first public 2014-08-11

Authors (7)

Wesolowska-Andersen A first · Bahl MI · Carvalho V · Kristiansen K · Sicheritz-Pontén T · Gupta R · Licht TR last

Downloads

PRJNA243036.csv.gz (1.4 KB) · parquet (70.9 KB) — all 24 samples, every field with route and confidence · PRJNA243036_determinations.csv.gz (2.1 KB) — 210 evidence rows

Samples (24 · every field this project has values for · hover a cell for its source)
Loading the sample table…