Home › Studies › PRJNA589622
PRJNA589622 SRP229815

Underfeeding/overfeeding and vancomycin gut study, Phoenix

Underfeeding and oral vancomycin perturb the human gut microbiome and impair nutrient absorption

95 adult gut metagenome/16S rRNA samples from Phoenix, USA, from a two-phase inpatient intervention study comparing underfeeding versus overfeeding diets and oral vancomycin versus placebo. machine-written summary

95 samples · 95 runs · US · Adult · 2019 · 3.38 Gbp / sample

Sources
✓Sequence archive 950○Abstract / description–Full text–Supplementary tables–External resources–User contribution–Human verified

Checked this project's papers and archive records yourself? Mark it human-verified.

what each source gave
✓ Sequence archive950 sample values (collection date, country, intervention, intervention detail, latitude, location locality, location region, longitude)
○ Abstract / descriptionread; no usable statement
– Full textno open-access full text linked
– Supplementary tablesno supplementary tables available (or none open access)
– External resourcesnot covered by the external resources we ingest
– User contributionnothing uploaded yet
– Human verifiednot yet checked by a person · I checked this project — verify it
Interventions

intervention · arms resolved

RControlled / prescribed diet or feeding regimen: 19 people · 38 samplesdiet 19 people · 38 samplesControl / pre-intervention baseline (sample level only): 19 people · 57 samplesno intervention 19 people · 57 samples
randomised to parallel arms

19 people have samples in more than one arm.

Antibiotic given as the study intervention (incl. eradication therapy Controlled / prescribed diet or feeding regimen design randomized_controlled_trial · population healthy_control · Underfeeding vs overfeeding diet; oral vancomycin vs placebo

“underfeeding versus overfeeding) and antibiotic” — bioproject.description (study level; per-sample arms are in the intervention column below)

Samples at a glance
1 sampling locations · 1 country
Age
adult95
Country
US95
Body site
primary95
Collected 2014–2017
2014: 25 samples2015: 20 samples2016: 40 samples2017: 10 samples20142017
Sequencing depth per sample · this project all projects
all projects, 0–0.03 Gbp: 25,080 samples (4 %)this project, 0–0.03 Gbp: 2 samplesall projects, 0.03–0.1 Gbp: 17,066 samples (3 %)all projects, 0.1–0.3 Gbp: 29,179 samples (5 %)all projects, 0.3–1 Gbp: 47,044 samples (8 %)this project, 0.3–1 Gbp: 1 samplesall projects, 1–3 Gbp: 124,983 samples (22 %)this project, 1–3 Gbp: 35 samplesall projects, 3–10 Gbp: 253,728 samples (44 %)this project, 3–10 Gbp: 56 samplesall projects, 10–30 Gbp: 72,533 samples (13 %)this project, 10–30 Gbp: 1 samplesall projects, 30–100 Gbp: 3,024 samples (1 %)all projects, 100–300 Gbp: 106 samples (0 %)all projects, ≥ 300 Gbp: 9 samples (0 %)project median 3.38 Gbp per sample0130Gbp
Sampling design and relatedness

longitudinal

19 of 19 people sampled more than once (95 samples; median 5, up to 5 per person) · follow-up median 18 d (max 20 d) · median interval between samples 3 d (time from collection dates). Schedule stated by the source: “Repeated sampling of 19 subjects across Phase I and Phase II of a two-phase crossover inpatient study (diet order UF_OF/OF_UF; timepoint_label distinct=2) with multiple numbered samples per subject (e” (time origin: intervention_start).

BB: day 0B: day 2B: day 4B: day 8B: day 18CC: day 0C: day 3C: day 5C: day 9C: day 19DD: day 0D: day 2D: day 5D: day 8D: day 20EE: day 0E: day 3E: day 5E: day 9E: day 18HH: day 0H: day 2H: day 5H: day 8H: day 18II: day 0I: day 2I: day 4I: day 8I: day 18JJ: day 0J: day 2J: day 5J: day 8J: day 18KK: day 0K: day 2K: day 5K: day 8K: day 18MM: day 0M: day 2M: day 5M: day 8M: day 18NN: day 0N: day 2N: day 5N: day 8N: day 18OO: day 0O: day 2O: day 5O: day 8O: day 18PP: day 0P: day 2P: day 5P: day 8P: day 18QQ: day 0Q: day 2Q: day 5Q: day 9Q: day 18RR: day 0R: day 2R: day 5R: day 8R: day 20TT: day 0T: day 2T: day 5T: day 8T: day 18UU: day 0U: day 2U: day 5U: day 8U: day 18VV: day 0V: day 2V: day 5V: day 8V: day 20YY: day 0Y: day 3Y: day 6Y: day 9Y: day 20ZZ: day 0Z: day 3Z: day 6Z: day 9Z: day 190 d5 d10 d15 d20 d

Each row is one person (19 shown); dots are samples at days since that person's first sample.

How longitudinal and relatedness information is derived

Community composition
Faecalibacterium 15.0%Roseburia 6.4%Prevotella 6.4%Bacteroides 5.5%Blautia_A 4.5%Akkermansia 4.1%Alistipes 3.5%Phocaeicola 3.5%Mediterraneibacter 1.9%Fusicatenibacter 1.8%Parabacteroides 1.3%Ruminococcoides 1.2%not assigned to a genus 9.0%other genera 35.8%

Genera, mean relative abundance over 85 profiled gut samples of this project (Sandpiper SingleM profiles, GTDB R232; low-depth and non-metagenome profiles left out).

Field coverage
fieldsamplescoverageR1R2R3R4
age_category95 100%
country95 100%95
health_condition0 0%
subject_id95 100%95
collection_date95 100%95
detailed_location95 100%
intervention95 100%95
intervention_detail95 100%95
latitude95 100%95
location_locality95 100%95
location_region95 100%95
longitude95 100%95
timepoint_label95 100%95
Papers (1)
  • Diet-Related Alterations of Gut Bile Salt Hydrolases Determined Using a Metagenomic Analysis of the Human Microbiome. 2021 PMID 33915727 PMC8038126 unsure
Details
Archive description

Metagenomic shotgun and V4 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing of human gut communities during dietary (underfeeding versus overfeeding) and antibiotic (vancomycin versus placebo) interventions in a two-phase inpatient study.

How this project entered the registry

Classified as human gut / stool / oral cavity shotgun DNA metagenome of adult by deterministic_prior with confidence 0.90. Assay shotgun_dna.

  • host external_curation.infant_catalog · “infant triage reason_code age_adult_only”
  • body site study.title · “perturb the human gut microbiome and impair”
  • body site study.description · “sequencing of human gut communities during dietary”
  • body site study.title · “Underfeeding and oral vancomycin perturb the”
  • life stage external_curation.infant_catalog · “infant triage reason_code age_adult_only”
Evidence examples (one per field × route)
samplefieldvaluerouteconf.sourcequote
SAMN13288211collection_date2014-03-22R10.90biosample.attribute:collection_date2014-03-22
SAMN13288211countryUSR10.90sample.attr.geo_loc_nameUSA: Phoenix
SAMN13288211interventionno_interventionR10.80biosample.attribute:host_diethost_diet: WMD
SAMN13288211intervention_detailweight-maintaining (eucaloric) baseline diet phase; assigned arm: underfeeding-then-overfeeding diet sequence armR10.80biosample.attribute:host_diethost_diet: WMD
SAMN13288211latitude33.4900R10.90biosample.attribute:lat_lon33.49 N 112.05 W
SAMN13288211location_localityPhoenixR10.85biosample.attribute:geo_loc_nameUSA: Phoenix
SAMN13288211location_regionArizonaR10.60biosample.attribute:lat_lon33.49 N 112.05 W
SAMN13288211longitude-112.0500R10.90biosample.attribute:lat_lon33.49 N 112.05 W
SAMN13288211subject_idBR10.85sample.attr.host_subject_idB
SAMN13288241subject_idMR10.85biosample.attribute:host_subject_idhost_subject_id: M
SAMN13288211timepoint_labelPhase IR10.85sample.attr.study_phasePhase I
Sequencing

95 runs over 95 samples · mean 3.46 Gbp per run (median 3.38 Gbp, total 328.50 Gbp; 95 runs with a base count) · layout PAIRED 95 · platform ILLUMINA 95 · models Illumina NovaSeq 6000 (95) · 89% of runs with a Sandpiper profile · first public 2019-11-20

Authors (14)

Jia B first · Park D · Chun BH · Hahn Y · Jeon CO last · Tarracchini C first · Fontana F · Mancabelli L · Lugli GA · Alessandri G · Turroni F · Ventura M · Milani C last · van Sinderen D

Downloads

PRJNA589622.csv.gz (3.9 KB) · parquet (75.1 KB) — all 95 samples, every field with route and confidence · PRJNA589622_determinations.csv.gz (7.1 KB) — 950 evidence rows

Samples (95 · every field this project has values for · hover a cell for its source)
Loading the sample table…