Delivery mode & infant gut colonization
Longitudinal cohort of 263 samples (rectal and vaginal samples from mothers, stool from infants) comparing gut microbiome colonization in infants born by planned pre-labor versus emergent post-labor C-section, sampled over the first two weeks of life. machine-written summary
263 samples · 526 runs · US · Neonate · 2020 · 0.15 Gbp / sample
Checked this project's papers and archive records yourself? Mark it human-verified.
what each source gave
| ✓ Sequence archive | 927 sample values (age, family id, family role, timepoint) |
| ○ Abstract / description | read; no usable statement |
| ✓ Full text | 1,149 sample values (age, country, location locality, location region, location site, preterm status) · PMC7762768 |
| ✓ Supplementary tables | 775 sample values (birth weight grams, delivery mode, gestational age weeks, maternal antibiotics, subject id) |
| – External resources | not covered by the external resources we ingest |
| – User contribution | nothing uploaded yet |
| – Human verified | not yet checked by a person · I checked this project — verify it |
longitudinalmother–infant
54 of 73 people sampled more than once (147 samples; median 3, up to 5 per person) · follow-up median 13 d (max 16 d) · median interval between samples 10 d (time from age at collection). Schedule stated by the source: “Infant stool sampled multiple times in first two weeks of life (birth, d1-d4, d14); mother sampled near delivery” (time origin: birth); stated follow-up 14 d.
Each row is one person (36 shown of 54); dots are samples at days since that person's first sample; rows of one family are adjacent and coloured by role (mother, father, child, twin).
73 families (family_id): 63 mother–infant pairs with maternal rectal + infant stool, 10 infants only · 63 families with 126 sampled people (63 with a parent and a child).
motherchild · circles are people (pale = no sequenced sample), arrows run donor → recipient and parent → child, curved lines join twins, partners and siblings, squares are shared settings or families without recorded roles. Shown: 24 of 63 families (one per family structure, then more). 73 people in the project overall.
Families (25 of 63)
Genera, mean relative abundance over 120 profiled gut samples of this project (Sandpiper SingleM profiles, GTDB R232; low-depth and non-metagenome profiles left out).
| field | samples | coverage | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| age_category | 166 | 63% | ||||
| country | 166 | 63% | 166 | |||
| health_condition | 0 | 0% | ||||
| subject_id | 263 | 100% | 263 | |||
| detailed_location | 263 | 100% | ||||
| family_id | 263 | 100% | 263 | |||
| family_role | 263 | 100% | 263 | |||
| location_locality | 263 | 100% | 263 | |||
| location_region | 263 | 100% | 263 | |||
| location_site | 263 | 100% | 263 | |||
| timepoint_label | 263 | 100% | 263 | |||
| age_at_collection_days | 166 | 63% | 138 | 28 | ||
| preterm_status | 166 | 63% | 166 | |||
| birth_weight_grams | 129 | 49% | 129 | |||
| delivery_mode | 129 | 49% | 129 | |||
| gestational_age_weeks | 129 | 49% | 129 | |||
| maternal_antibiotics | 125 | 48% | 125 |
- Delivery Mode Affects Stability of Early Infant Gut Microbiota. PMID 33377127 PMC7762768 curated
- A compendium of 32,277 metagenome-assembled genomes and over 80 million genes from the early-life human gut microbiome. PMID 36050292 PMC9437082 curated
- A metagenomic catalog of the early-life human gut virome. PMID 38424077 PMC10904392 curated
Archive description
Mode of delivery is one of the earliest and strongest influences on the infant gut microbiome composition in the first few months of life. Children born by Cesarean section (C-section) lack species from the Bacteroides genus in their gut microbial community, and this difference can be detectable until 6-18 months of age. One hypothesis is that these differences stem from lack of exposure to the maternal vaginal microbiome, as children born by C-section do not pass through the birth canal however, Bacteroides species are not common members of the vaginal microbiome, thus this explanation seems inadequate. Here, we set out to re-evaluate this hypothesis by collecting rectal and vaginal samples before delivery from 75 mothers with paired stool from their infants in the first two weeks of life. We compared microbial profiles of infants born by planned, pre-labor C-section to those born by emergent, post-labor surgery (where the child was in the birth canal, but eventually delivered through an abdominal incision), and found no significant differences in the microbiome between these two groups. Both groups showed the characteristic signature lack of Bacteroides species, despite their difference in exposure to the birth canal. Surprisingly, this signature was only evident in samples from week two of life, but not in the first week. Children born by C-section often had high abundance of Bacteroides in their first few days of life, but these were not stable colonizers of the infant gut, as they were not detectable by week two. Finally, we used metagenomic sequencing to compare microbial strains in maternal vaginal and rectal samples and samples from their infants we found evidence for mother-to-child transmission of rectal rather than vaginal strains. These results challenge birth canal exposure as the dominant factor in infant gut microbiome establishment and implicate colonization efficiency rather than exposure as a dictating factor of the newborn gut microbiome composition.
How this project entered the registry
Classified as human gut / stool / vaginal / urogenital mixed assays of neonate and adult by opus_adjudicated with confidence 0.60. Assay mixed.
- host run.host_tax_id · “9606”
- host study.description · “75 mothers with paired stool from their infants”
- body site study.description · “collecting rectal and vaginal samples before delivery”
- body site study.description · “paired stool from their infants”
- life stage study.description · “infants in the first two weeks of life”
- life stage study.description · “75 mothers”
Evidence examples (one per field × route)
| sample | field | value | route | conf. | source | quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAMN15854573 | age_at_collection_days | 2.0 | R1 | 0.70 | biosample.attribute:timepoint | d2 |
| SAMN15854580 | age_at_collection_days | 14 | R1 | 0.85 | sample.title | 2wk |
| SAMN15854575 | age_at_collection_days | 17 | R3 | 0.40 | paper.fulltext.results | median 17 days of life |
| SAMN15854586 | birth_weight_grams | 3090 | R2 | 0.75 | paper.supp.table | birthweight (gr)=3090.0 |
| SAMN15854573 | country | US | R3 | 0.80 | paper.fulltext.methods | Massachusetts General Hospital Labor & Delivery unit in Boston |
| SAMN15854586 | delivery_mode | c_section_emergency | R2 | 0.75 | paper.supp.table | delivery mode=Post-labor CS |
| SAMN15854573 | family_id | V1 | R1 | 0.85 | biosample.attribute:family_id | family_id: V1 |
| SAMN15854573 | family_role | child | R1 | 0.85 | biosample.attribute:isolation_source | isolation_source: child_stool |
| SAMN15854586 | gestational_age_weeks | 39.0 | R2 | 0.75 | paper.supp.table | gestational age (weeks)=39.0 |
| SAMN15854573 | location_locality | Boston | R3 | 0.70 | paper.fulltext.methods | Labor & Delivery unit in Boston, MA |
| SAMN15854573 | location_region | Massachusetts | R3 | 0.70 | paper.fulltext.methods | Boston, MA were enrolled in this prospective |
| SAMN15854573 | location_site | Massachusetts General Hospital Labor & Delivery unit | R3 | 0.70 | paper.fulltext.methods | Massachusetts General Hospital Labor & Delivery unit |
| SAMN15854586 | maternal_antibiotics | yes | R2 | 0.75 | paper.supp.table | Maternal ABX=Yes |
| SAMN15854573 | preterm_status | term | R3 | 0.70 | paper.fulltext.methods | presenting for delivery at ≥ 37 weeks of gestation |
| SAMN15854573 | subject_id | V1_child | R2 | 0.80 | archive | |
| SAMN15854584 | subject_id | C4 | R2 | 0.85 | paper.supp.table | family.ID=C4 |
| SAMN15854573 | timepoint_label | d2 | R1 | 0.80 | biosample_attr | d2 |
Sequencing
526 runs over 263 samples · mean 1.07 Gbp per run (median 0.15 Gbp, total 563.18 Gbp; 526 runs with a base count) · layout PAIRED 526 · platform ILLUMINA 526 · models Illumina HiSeq 2000 (263), Illumina MiSeq (263) · 43% of runs with a Sandpiper profile · first public 2020-11-18
Authors (28)
Mitchell CM first · Mazzoni C · Hogstrom L · Bryant A · Bergerat A · Cher A · Pochan S · Herman P · Carrigan M · Sharp K · Huttenhower C · Lander ES · Vlamakis H · Xavier RJ · Yassour M last · Zeng S first · Patangia D · Almeida A · Zhou Z · Mu D · Paul Ross R · Stanton C · Wang S last · Li S · Ying J · Wang H · Qu Y · Niu X
Downloads
PRJNA657818.csv.gz (9.6 KB) · parquet (84.5 KB) — all 263 samples, every field with route and confidence · PRJNA657818_determinations.csv.gz (23.1 KB) — 2,851 evidence rows