Home › Studies › PRJNA993161
PRJNA993161 SRP450806

Oligosaccharide, probiotic effects post-antibiotic

Impact of complex oligosaccharides and a probiotic on the antibiotic-treated human microbiome

316 samples from healthy adult and elderly volunteers in the USA, studying antibiotic treatment combined with a prebiotic/fibre and probiotic intervention on the gut microbiome. machine-written summary

316 samples · 316 runs · US · Adult · 2023 · 2.27 Gbp / sample

Sources
✓Sequence archive 1,580✓Abstract / description 948–Full text–Supplementary tables–External resources–User contribution–Human verified

Checked this project's papers and archive records yourself? Mark it human-verified.

what each source gave
✓ Sequence archive1,580 sample values (age, country, sex, subject id, timepoint)
✓ Abstract / description948 sample values (antibiotic exposure, health condition, health condition detail)
– Full textno open-access full text linked
– Supplementary tablesno supplementary tables available (or none open access)
– External resourcesnot covered by the external resources we ingest
– User contributionnothing uploaded yet
– Human verifiednot yet checked by a person · I checked this project — verify it
Interventions

intervention — arms not resolved

Antibiotic given as the study intervention (incl. eradication therapy Prebiotic / dietary fibre supplement Probiotic (live microorganisms; single strain or mixture) design randomized_controlled_trial · population healthy_control · Complex oligosaccharide with/without probiotic in antibiotic-treated healthy volunteers

“complex oligosaccharide with and without a probiotic” — bioproject.description (study level; per-sample arms are in the intervention column below)

Samples at a glance
1 country
Age
adult262
elderly54
Condition
healthy_control316
Sex
male168
female148
Country
US316
Body site
primary316
Sequencing depth per sample · this project all projects
all projects, 0–0.03 Gbp: 25,080 samples (4 %)this project, 0–0.03 Gbp: 1 samplesall projects, 0.03–0.1 Gbp: 17,066 samples (3 %)this project, 0.03–0.1 Gbp: 1 samplesall projects, 0.1–0.3 Gbp: 29,179 samples (5 %)this project, 0.1–0.3 Gbp: 5 samplesall projects, 0.3–1 Gbp: 47,044 samples (8 %)this project, 0.3–1 Gbp: 45 samplesall projects, 1–3 Gbp: 124,983 samples (22 %)this project, 1–3 Gbp: 170 samplesall projects, 3–10 Gbp: 253,728 samples (44 %)this project, 3–10 Gbp: 94 samplesall projects, 10–30 Gbp: 72,533 samples (13 %)all projects, 30–100 Gbp: 3,024 samples (1 %)all projects, 100–300 Gbp: 106 samples (0 %)all projects, ≥ 300 Gbp: 9 samples (0 %)project median 2.27 Gbp per sample0130Gbp
Sampling design and relatedness

longitudinal

53 of 53 people sampled more than once (316 samples; median 6, up to 6 per person) · follow-up median 34 d (max 34 d) · median interval between samples 5 d (time from timepoint numbers, unit from the stated sampling schedule). Schedule stated by the source: “53 subjects sampled repeatedly (median/max 6/6 samples each) at study days 1, 5, 9, 14, 28, 35” (time origin: other); stated follow-up 35 d.

NS001NS001: day 0NS001: day 4NS001: day 8NS001: day 13NS001: day 27NS001: day 34NS002NS002: day 0NS002: day 4NS002: day 8NS002: day 13NS002: day 27NS002: day 34NS003NS003: day 0NS003: day 4NS003: day 8NS003: day 13NS003: day 27NS003: day 34NS004NS004: day 0NS004: day 4NS004: day 8NS004: day 13NS004: day 27NS004: day 34NS005NS005: day 0NS005: day 4NS005: day 8NS005: day 13NS005: day 27NS005: day 34NS006NS006: day 0NS006: day 4NS006: day 8NS006: day 13NS006: day 27NS006: day 34NS007NS007: day 0NS007: day 4NS007: day 8NS007: day 13NS007: day 27NS007: day 34NS008NS008: day 0NS008: day 4NS008: day 8NS008: day 13NS008: day 27NS008: day 34NS010NS010: day 0NS010: day 4NS010: day 8NS010: day 13NS010: day 27NS010: day 34NS011NS011: day 0NS011: day 4NS011: day 8NS011: day 13NS011: day 27NS011: day 34NS012NS012: day 0NS012: day 4NS012: day 8NS012: day 13NS012: day 27NS012: day 34NS013NS013: day 0NS013: day 4NS013: day 8NS013: day 13NS013: day 27NS013: day 34NS014NS014: day 0NS014: day 4NS014: day 8NS014: day 13NS014: day 27NS014: day 34NS015NS015: day 0NS015: day 4NS015: day 8NS015: day 13NS015: day 27NS015: day 34NS017NS017: day 0NS017: day 4NS017: day 8NS017: day 13NS017: day 27NS017: day 34NS018NS018: day 0NS018: day 4NS018: day 8NS018: day 13NS018: day 27NS018: day 34NS019NS019: day 0NS019: day 4NS019: day 8NS019: day 13NS019: day 27NS019: day 34NS020NS020: day 0NS020: day 4NS020: day 8NS020: day 13NS020: day 27NS020: day 34NS021NS021: day 0NS021: day 4NS021: day 8NS021: day 13NS021: day 27NS021: day 34NS022NS022: day 0NS022: day 4NS022: day 8NS022: day 13NS022: day 27NS022: day 34NS023NS023: day 0NS023: day 4NS023: day 8NS023: day 13NS023: day 27NS023: day 34NS024NS024: day 0NS024: day 4NS024: day 8NS024: day 13NS024: day 27NS024: day 34NS025NS025: day 0NS025: day 4NS025: day 8NS025: day 13NS025: day 27NS025: day 34NS026NS026: day 0NS026: day 4NS026: day 8NS026: day 13NS026: day 27NS026: day 34NS027NS027: day 0NS027: day 4NS027: day 8NS027: day 13NS027: day 27NS027: day 34NS028NS028: day 0NS028: day 4NS028: day 8NS028: day 13NS028: day 27NS028: day 34NS029NS029: day 0NS029: day 4NS029: day 8NS029: day 13NS029: day 27NS029: day 34NS030NS030: day 0NS030: day 4NS030: day 8NS030: day 13NS030: day 27NS030: day 34NS031NS031: day 0NS031: day 4NS031: day 8NS031: day 13NS031: day 27NS031: day 34NS032NS032: day 0NS032: day 4NS032: day 8NS032: day 13NS032: day 27NS032: day 34NS033NS033: day 0NS033: day 4NS033: day 8NS033: day 13NS033: day 27NS033: day 34NS034NS034: day 0NS034: day 4NS034: day 8NS034: day 13NS034: day 27NS034: day 34NS035NS035: day 0NS035: day 4NS035: day 8NS035: day 13NS035: day 27NS035: day 34NS036NS036: day 0NS036: day 4NS036: day 8NS036: day 13NS036: day 27NS036: day 34NS037NS037: day 0NS037: day 4NS037: day 8NS037: day 13NS037: day 27NS037: day 34NS038NS038: day 0NS038: day 4NS038: day 8NS038: day 13NS038: day 27NS038: day 340 d8 d17 d26 d34 d

Each row is one person (36 shown of 53); dots are samples at days since that person's first sample.

How longitudinal and relatedness information is derived

Community composition
Bifidobacterium 9.9%Lacticaseibacillus 8.3%Lactiplantibacillus 5.1%Ligilactobacillus 5.0%Blautia_A 4.4%Klebsiella 3.7%Faecalibacterium 3.3%Roseburia 3.0%Mediterraneibacter 2.9%Bacteroides 2.7%Prevotella 2.3%Escherichia 2.0%not assigned to a genus 9.3%other genera 38.0%

Genera, mean relative abundance over 284 profiled gut samples of this project (Sandpiper SingleM profiles, GTDB R232; low-depth and non-metagenome profiles left out).

Field coverage
fieldsamplescoverageR1R2R3R4
age_category316 100%
country316 100%316
health_condition316 100%316
subject_id316 100%316
age_at_collection_days316 100%316
antibiotic_exposure316 100%316
health_condition_detail316 100%316
sex316 100%316
timepoint_label316 100%316
Papers (1)
  • Precision modulation of dysbiotic adult microbiomes with a human-milk-derived synbiotic reshapes gut microbial composition and metabolites. 2023 PMID 37657443 own_data
Details
Archive description

The study evaluates the synergy of the use of a complex oligosaccharide with and without a probiotic on the human microbiome in antibiotic-treated healthy volunteers.

How this project entered the registry

Classified as human gut / stool shotgun DNA metagenome of adult and elderly by opus_adjudicated with confidence 0.60. Assay shotgun_dna.

  • host study.title · “antibiotic-treated human microbiome”
  • host run.scientific_name · “Homo sapiens”
  • body site sample.attr.tissue · “stool (n=316/316)”
  • life stage sample.attr.age · “31 (n=250/316)”
  • life stage sample.attr.age · “67 (n=66/316)”
Evidence examples (one per field × route)
samplefieldvaluerouteconf.sourcequote
SAMN36676629age_at_collection_days12783.8R10.85sample.attr.age35
SAMN36676629antibiotic_exposureyesR40.50study.descriptionantibiotic-treated healthy volunteers
SAMN36676629countryUSR10.90sample.attr.geo_loc_nameUSA
SAMN36676629health_conditionhealthy_controlR40.50paper.abstractwe induced dysbiosis in 56 healthy volunteers using antibiotics to test a synbiotic
SAMN36676629health_condition_detailhealthy volunteersR40.50paper.abstractinduced dysbiosis in 56 healthy volunteers using antibiotics
SAMN36676629sexmaleR10.90sample.attr.sexmale
SAMN36676629subject_idNS001R10.70sample.name_rule:aliasNS001D101
SAMN36676629timepoint_label1R10.85sample.attr.day_of_study1
Sequencing

316 runs over 316 samples · mean 2.24 Gbp per run (median 2.27 Gbp, total 707.10 Gbp; 316 runs with a base count) · layout PAIRED 316 · platform ILLUMINA 316 · models Illumina NovaSeq 6000 (316) · 90% of runs with a Sandpiper profile · first public 2023-09-02

Authors (0)

No author record.

Downloads

PRJNA993161.csv.gz (8.8 KB) · parquet (81.1 KB) — all 316 samples, every field with route and confidence · PRJNA993161_determinations.csv.gz (13.7 KB) — 2,528 evidence rows

Samples (316 · every field this project has values for · hover a cell for its source)
Loading the sample table…